Abe: I’ll offer a controversial opinion as I claim it would be inappropriate of me to comment.

Filed under: Seijigiri Supplements, Shasetsu - Op/Ed
Posted by Garrett DeOrio at 10:57 pm on Friday, October 6, 2006

“You know, when my forebears killed yours, it really wasn’t that bad. I mean, dude, seriously, who can say what happened? Convicted criminals are, like, not really criminals because they were, like, not clearly breaking the rules of their gang, you know? Anyway, it’s not my place to say anything one way or the other about how it really wasn’t that bad when my forebears protected yours by killing them so they couldn’t be put in a subservient position to Europeans. So, what should I bring when I come over to your place? You guys like gyouza?”

Abe Shinzo is preparing for his first visit to Japan’s neighbors as Prime Minister. He’ll visit the PRC’s Hu Jintao on Sunday and follow that up by meeting with the RoK’s Roh Moo-Hyun on Monday. He prepared well by issuing the following statement in the Diet on Thursday:

“The people who are said to be so-called Class-A criminals were tried and convicted as war criminals at the Tokyo tribunal, but they were not war criminals under domestic laws. That also was the case for my relative [wartime Cabinet member, Manchukuo administrator, untried war criminal, 56th and 57th Prime Minister, and Abe’s grandfather Kishi Nobusuke].”

This after Abe gave not particularly ringing endoresements to Prime Minister Murayama Tomiichi’s August 15, 1995 apology for Japan’s role in World War II and Chief Cabinet Secretary Kono Yohei’s 1993 statement on “comfort women,” saying those statements were made by the Cabinets at those times and were handed down to his Cabinet, and failed to draw a distinction between the view of wartime history propounded by the Yushukan at Yasukuni Shrine and the view of his Cabinet when questioned by the DPJ’s Kan Naoto.

Dumbass.

Neither neutral nor responsible, I know, but there’s not much else to say. Beyond the issue of Abe’s long-known hard right wing views inevitably rising to the surface while he serves as PM, those poorly-reasoned and politically inept statements, the Prime Minister’s failure to take what should be no-brainer stances, and the proof that his being the first PM born after WWII is irrelevant to his views on history are going to make his seemingly insincere goal of mending ties with, or at least extingusihing the flames on the bridges with South Korea and China very difficult. Abe took a crowbar to his own best horse’s leg before his chariot even reached the starting line.

It simply will not do for the Prime Minister to pretend that Japan’s role in the War is a hotly debated, unclear issue outside of his right wing circles if he actually wants to make his “Beautiful Country” one that is on friendly terms with its neighbors. Korea, China, and pretty much the rest of the world know exactly where they stand on the issues surrounding Japan’s wartime actions and they tend to stand together, from Stalinist autocrats to democratic leaders as divorced from reality as Abe. (It doesn’t seem to be a very good time for world leaders, does it? When did the parody become the reality?) It also seems that most of the rest of the world would like to be on good terms with Japan, at least on trade terms, but that it’s Japan that keeps stymieing those efforts. There’s a stone in diplomacy’s hoof and Abe seems content to have his horse run on it.

It is Abe Shinzo’s prerogative and responsibility to take some rather obvious steps towards moving the country into more fruitful diplomatic territory. It’s a shame he refuses to do so.


Related Posts:

5 Comments »

Comments may be subject to moderation and/or approval before appearing. There is no need to post the same comment twice. The site moderator may remove any comment he or she deems inappropriate, without notice.

113

Comment by ken

October 7, 2006 @ 12:51 am

In last Monday’s policy speech, Abe said:

“A beautiful country, Japan” is a country that is trusted, respected and loved in the world, and which demonstrates leadership.

So much for that pillar of the plan. One of the big problems here is the belief that he’s speaking to a domestic-only audience. I watched the session today and they get caught up in the heat of the moment. The next thing you know, a Moriesque statement comes out and already, in the first full week of his term, we have confirmation that he won’t be able to lead Japan to better relations with its neighbors. It sad, really, how bad these guys are at just keeping such ego-driven drivel out of the public discourse. He’s supposed to be a public servant, not his ancestors’ servant.

114

Comment by Publicus

October 8, 2006 @ 3:48 pm

I am preparing the grease for the revolving door of the prime minister position as we speak. He won’t last until this time next year.

115

Comment by ken

October 8, 2006 @ 4:39 pm

Publicus,

I hope that revolving door isn’t done by the same people who built the one over at Roppongi Hills.

At any rate, if he ends up stinking (which we’ll know within a few months, if not sooner), I hope he’s out soon. If he can somehow make some headway with Japan/China/South Korea relations and with domestic economic reform, I think the stability will help the country.

The revolving door of the 90s didn’t do much to help get out of the economic funk.

118

Comment by Lone Ranger

October 8, 2006 @ 11:53 pm

The ChiComs are the LAST people to lecture Japan about war criminals, since they have slaughtered 65 million of their own people (and counting). The Chinese leadership squeal like stuck pigs when anyone mentions their own human rights abuses, accusing them of “meddling in their internal affairs.” Abe is right. The 14 war criminals in Yasukuni did not violate domestic laws — just as abortionists who have killed more than 42 million babies in the United States have not violated domestic laws.

I love gyoza.

122

Comment by DeOrio

October 9, 2006 @ 4:25 am

I agree that the CCP is more than a little hypocritical when it comes to human rights abuses and historical issues, Kimosabe. 65 million sounds a bit high, including a lot of deaths of unclear provenance perhaps. (What I mean is, for example, 25 million died in a famine under Mao, which the CCP exacerbated, but can we say they slaughtered all those people? Is every person executed slaughtered? Has the State of Texas slaughtered hundreds of people in the last few decades?)
A similar counting case could be made on the abortion point. Some of those might have been one-or-the-other cases, etc.
The main point, though, is that, just as the anti-abortion views of a woman who has had an abortion are no less valid for her having had an abortion, the complaints China has over Japan’s reluctance to deal with its past frankly are no less valid because the CCP has done more harm to China than Japan could have had they tried for a century.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>