TPR News: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 - Cellular phone number portability and Kim Jong Il

Filed under: TPR News
Posted by Garrett DeOrio at 10:45 pm on Wednesday, October 25, 2006

Business

The big domestic news story all week - headlining newspapers, websites, TV news shows, and radio alike - has been the introduction on Tuesday of cellular phone number portability, which enables customers to keep their phone numbers, but not their cellular e-mail addresses, as they move from one cellular service provider to another. The move has sent Japan’s three major cellular companies - NTT DoCoMo, au by KDDI, and SoftBank - scurrying to introduce new features, primarily centered around music downloading and network accessibility, to keep current customers and attract new ones. SoftBank emerged has an early winner by offering its customers free daytime calls and e-mails to all other SoftBank customers. It’s been a good year for SoftBank in some respects, their baseball team, the Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks, just barely missed going to the Japan Series.

The impact on any of the companies’ bottom lines is still unclear.

Coming in a close second has been Sony’s worsening image in the wake of its delay in dealing with the problems found in its hot, very hot, lithium-ion batteries. While the problems seem to stem from the introduction of metal particles into the batteries during manufacturing in Kooriyama, Fukushima Prefecture, Sony has blamed the fires caused by its batteries on the system configuration of Dell and Apple computers. This hasn’t helped Sony’s image at all.

However, Sony Vice President Nakagawa Yutaka apologized Tuesday for the problems, saying that the company was not considering disciplinary actions against its top executives and admitting that Toshiba had been joined by others in suing Sony for lost business.

Society

Three junior high school students were arrested after forcing a classmate to play a “fainting game,” in other words, pinning him to the floor and pressing on his chest until he lost consciousness, then beating him in the face, head, and body, supposedly to revive him. The boys reportedly did it for fun. If precedent is anything to go by, the boys will be let off after a little public crying and a suspension from school as their parents express surprise (boys who bullied and beat a classmate into wheelchair-bound nerve damage got a mere six-month suspension from school recently) and the people who are supposed to be in charge but aren’t adult enough to stick up for their charges will go on wringing their hands at best. (Yes, I know there is blatant editorialism in the news here. I don’t think my stance here should be at all controversial, though.)

Politics & Society (Do you know where to draw the line?)

Harassment of North Korean residents of Japan (often born in Japan, sometimes even third generation) and those affiliated with North Korea, never a rare occurrence, has been on the rise since the DPRK announced its nuclear test on October 9th. A bamboo grove adjacent to the headquarters of Chongryon, Japan’s largest North Korean-affililiated group and a de facto embassy for the country, with which Japan has no diplomatic relations, erupted in arson-induded flames nearly incinerating the headquarters building itself. Police security around the facility and others similar to it has increased since the DPRK’s July 5th missile tests, but threats to such facilities, and to North Korean schools, from ultra-nationalist right-wingers have been on the rise.

(Sixty-one years ago, within a few months of this day, Harry Truman observed that it might be a good policy to just let the Nazis and the Soviets fight each other to mutual extinction. Just a reminder for both the history and current-events buffs.)

Straight Politics

On Tuesday, Foreign Minister Aso Taro said there was still a risk of North Korea carrying out further nuclear tests and that he was not optimistic about the prospects of the Kim Family Regime returning to the table for disarmament talks anytime soon despite the dispatch of Chinese diplomats to Pyongyang, which Aso praised, and South Korean reports of Kim Jong Il’s apology for the test.

Aso observed that, in his memory, nuclear tests have been like Lay’s Potato Chips - no country being able to stop at just one.

Tougher sanctions on North Korea, along with Kim’s ejection of the World Food Programme last December and the cessation of humanitarian aid from South Korea, the North’s largest donor, following the missile tests, are likely to spur yet more belt-tightening throughout the DPRK and the further slimming down of the country’s already svelte populace, with even Kim’s favored armed forces being ordered to scavenge for potatos instead of waiting grain for unlikely grain shipments.

The impact of the by-election victories of Liberal Democratic Party candidates Kamei Zentaro in Kanagawa and Harada Kenji in Osaka is, and may well remain, unclear, but the successes are widely viewed as a boost for Prime Minister Abe Shinzo a month into his administration, the assumption being that public distaste for the way Abe has handled recent events would have translated into losses for the New Komeito-backed LDP candidates, both of whom won seats vacated due to the death of the incumbents, a not uncommon occurrence in the youthful LDP. The victories are a further blow to the struggling opposition Democratic Party of Japan and their ailing leader, Ozawa Ichiro.

To end on an uplifting note, Abe Shinzo’s decision to stick to Japan’s non-nuclear principles was praised by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, who told a group of Japanese academics and businessmen, “It benefits Asia as well as the people of Asia and the world that Prime Minister Abe emphasized Japan’s adherence to its three non-nuclear principles amid tensions over the nuclear issue.”

That’s all for tonight, we hope you enjoyed it, or found it informative, or both. Thanks for reading.

Leave us a comment and let us know what you think.


Related Posts:

18 Comments »

Comments may be subject to moderation and/or approval before appearing. There is no need to post the same comment twice. The site moderator may remove any comment he or she deems inappropriate, without notice.

293

Comment by ken

October 26, 2006 @ 2:43 am

SoftBank’s the winner? Not here…I’ve been itching to switch to AU for some time now. Think I’ll get over there next week.

302

Comment by Garrett

October 26, 2006 @ 1:14 pm

I’m an AU man myself - far and away the best as far as I’m concerned. I abandoned Vodafone, which was wretched, this past summer.

316

Comment by ken

October 27, 2006 @ 3:56 pm

Vodaphone was bad…but it was fine when it was J-Phone. Vodaphone seemed to have killed the network.

317

Comment by DeOrio

October 27, 2006 @ 7:23 pm

That’s true. I was quite happy with J-Phone. At the time, it had, except for a few frills, features equal to AU, with comparable service, smaller phones, and lower prices. Vodafone raised the prices and sent me lots of junk mail with pictures of David Beckham and Michael Schumacher on it, but apparently did nothing to improve the service. Technology lagged, too. Vodafone sucked, which is good for SoftBank - they can only get better.

319

Comment by Jess

October 27, 2006 @ 7:27 pm

Why are you guys so down on vodafone? You have to credit a foreign company for trying. Besides, Vodafone was the only company thathad easy overseas roaming to a lot of countries - AU only works in Japan.

320

Comment by John Sheridan

October 27, 2006 @ 10:07 pm

North Korean residents of Japan? Third generation? You’re gonna have to clear this up for me. How does anyone even know who they are? If these people escaped from North Korea, it doesn’t make much sense for them to to be harassed.

323

Comment by DeOrio

October 28, 2006 @ 12:48 am

Jess, we’re down on Vodafone because they deserve it. They were a foreign company, that’s true, but there’s nothing at all trailblazing or even necessarily difficult about that.
Who cares about overseas roaming? It’s subsantially cheaper to just rent a phone at your destination unless you absolutely need to keep the same phone number. Using Vodafone overseas was prohibitively expensive.

324

Comment by DeOrio

October 28, 2006 @ 12:54 am

John,
Unlike the US and many other Western countries, citizenship and nationality in Japan, Korea, and most of this part of the world is determined by who your parents were, your race, in other words, not where you were born, grew up, or live.
Some residents here of Korean descent have Korean names, most have Korean passports and hold “special permanent resident” status.
It seems that, schoolgirls being slashed (not killed, though) on the subway for wearing traditional Korean dress and coming from schools affiliated with the North aside, most of the North Koreans targeted emigrated for economic reasons and belonged to pro-Pyongyang groups. Chongryon, the group mentioned in TPR News, has large protraits of Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong-Il hanging in its lobby. They are openly North Korean and pro-North Korea. They are not refugees in this case.

330

Comment by Ken

October 28, 2006 @ 1:48 pm

John,

The North Koreans living in Japan being referred to here are (usually) part of a group known as ‘zainichi’ in Japannese. There are about 610,000 of these people, born, raised and educated in Japan, yet still considered Korean. The Wikipedia article about zainichi might be helpful.

347

Comment by Ken

October 30, 2006 @ 1:12 am

Garrett,

I’m going to play semantics and pick a bone with you here. It’s about comment #324 above. You mention ‘race’ - but I don’t think that’s an apposite word to use at all. I think ‘ethnicity’ or ‘cultural background’ are more accurate. Then again, I think there’s only one race: the human race.

353

Comment by DeOrio

October 30, 2006 @ 1:48 pm

That sure is picking a semantic bone, Ken. I think “race” and “ethnicity” are the same thing, the only difference being that “race” has been used to differentiate based on appearance. Then again, “ethnicity” is used to differentiate between people based on bloodlines and appearance more than on cultural background. When Koreans face discrimination in Japan, it has little to do with what they eat, and more to do with where their ancestors were from. If you want to say “ethnicity” where I’ve said “race,” that’s fine, but we’re talking about the same thing.
I don’t think “cultural background” is appropriate in this case because zainichi are often culturally and linguistically indistinguishable from ethnic Japanese. When a Korean goes to gets her special permanent resident card, it’s about what her grandfather’s name was, not about any practices or beliefs of her own.
I

358

Comment by Ken

October 31, 2006 @ 3:55 pm

Garrett,
I think you’re confused about something. At the age of 19, zainichi are given a choice: be a Japanese or Korean citizen. Like much of East Asia, Japan does not offer a (legal) dual citizenship. Thus, those who choose to become ‘Japanese’ assume a Japanese name and in return, get passports, a jyuminho and a honseki.

So, it’s sort of ridiculous to say that zainichi who have chosen to remain Korean are culturally indistinguishable from Japanese - they have Korean names! That’s pretty easy to spot, and very culturally different.

You know I’m with you on the language issue, for the most part. But, many zainichi will strongly claim not to be culturally the same as Japanese. If they were, why retain a Korean name and passport?

359

Comment by DeOrio

October 31, 2006 @ 4:49 pm

I’m referring more to being able to spot people or tell an immediate difference upon walking into someone’s house. Moreover, whether or not a zainichi becomes a Japanese citizen, they normally speak fluent Japanese, often as a native language, often without being able to speak fluent Korean. The distinction would be somewhat like the child of European parents being born and raised in the US. You might not guess anything was at all different about him until you heard an uncommon name. Granted, the names carry more weight here, and both Korea and Japan tend to have more homogenous names, foreign names being restricted, if not effectively prohibited for citizens, but the point remains: What’s in a name, under normal circumstances? On top of that, some zainichi who retain Korean citizenship use Japanese names in daily life. A name alone is just not a good indicator of culture. My name is De Orio, but I have a lot more in common with, say, a John Sheridan in the States than I do with any De Orio or di Iorio in Milan or Naples.
The passports are a fluke of the citizenship rules in the region. Third or fourth generation Koreans born and raised in Japan, have a lot in common culturally with their Japanese contemporaries than they do with Koreans in Korea. They’re slightly more Korean than you or I are Italian.
Why would a 19-year-old choose to retain citizenship in a country he may not have even spent much time in? Why would a 19-year-old in Boston get an Irish flag tattooed on his arm? Why would a 19-year-old in Miami identify himself as Italian? There are issues of emotion and familial pressure that play a role in that decision. Besides, keeping a Korean passport and special permanent resident status in Japan could be a wise decision if you plan to go back and forth, regardless of where your feelings lie culturally.

360

Comment by Ken Worsley

October 31, 2006 @ 4:58 pm

Third or fourth generation Koreans born and raised in Japan, have a lot in common culturally with their Japanese contemporaries than they do with Koreans in Korea.

Have you tried telling that to any zainichi recently?

361

Comment by DeOrio

October 31, 2006 @ 6:23 pm

Unless you’re going to survey a representative sample of zainichi Koreans, including both people over 19 holding Korean passports and those who opted to become naturalized Japanese citizens, it would be no more than anecdotal to ask. I’m not disputing that some zainichi Koreans think of themselves as Korean, that’s obvious and there are many nasty little racist occurrences and views among some Japanese that would reinforce such a view. (Some Black Americans view themselves as much part of a diaspora as American, it happens in every country and is exacerbated by racism.) I’m saying, with every possible qualification (that I’m not talking about everyone, that I don’t think being nationality or the other is better, that there are many ways to determine cultural heritage, and so on), that it doesn’t matter what one individual says. There are traits such as language, lifestyle, predominant cultural influences during formative years, etc. that can be observed, and that woudl lead a person to identify himself as Korean, even though he’s a lot more a part of Japanese society than he is a part of Korean society.
There are reasons beyond actual cultural similarity that lead people to identify with the nationalities of their ancestors. As I said before, the US is a great example of this and I think some of the same forces are at play in the zainichi communities in Japan.

363

Comment by Ken

November 1, 2006 @ 12:54 am

You didn’t answer my question. That was, seriously, one hell of a way not to give a yes/no answer.

364

Comment by DeOrio

November 1, 2006 @ 12:57 am

I haven’t discussed the subject with any zainichi lately, no. I thought that by calling the question unimportant, I implied that.

367

Comment by DeOrio

November 1, 2006 @ 1:40 am

I take that back. I checked a 国語 (Japanese to Japanese) dictionary and a 和英 (Japanese-English) dictionary and, technically, you and I are zainichi. So, Ken, you have a lot more in common with your Japanese contemporaries than you do with Koreans in Korea. Want to make something of it?

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>