Japan is Falling! America, too! HELP! Save us, Abe-man!

Filed under: Trans-Pacific Radio, Shasetsu - Op/Ed
Posted by Garrett DeOrio at 4:48 pm on Saturday, October 28, 2006

Reporters Without Borders, the press-freedom advocacy group, released its annual Press Freedom Index on Tuesday, in which the freedom of the press in almost all of the world’s countries is assessed and the countries ranked. Results are determined by tabulating factors such as the number of journalists killed, imprisoned, or otherwise hindered, the amount of censorship to which journalists and media are subjected, etc.

Unsurprisingly, North Korea was at the bottom of the list, coming in at number 168, but it was closely challenged by Turkmenistan (no. 167), Eritrea (no. 166), and Cuba (no. 165.) (Take that, American college faux-leftist hippies. Is it really worth sticking up for Cuba just to justify your trendy, purchased Che Guevara T-shirt or poster?) In North Korea, people who attempt to resolder radios so as to receive more than one station are sent to labor camps, in Turkmenistan, journalist Ogulsapar Muradova was tortured to death. This ought to give you and idea of what the bottom of the list is like.

Equally unsurprisingly, Northern European countries, specifically, Finland, Ireland, Iceland, and the Netherlands tied for number one, with no reports of intimidation of journalists and other good indicators of a free press.

The Land of the Free, on the other hand, has a government that does not like it’s own First Amendment, and is thus is a profoundly disappointing number 53 in the rankings. Not the Land of the Free Press, apparently. The sad part is that America is such a gleefully self-propagandizing nation that many of it’s people argue in favor of these very encroachments upon their own freedoms. Reporters jailed for not revealing sources? Fine. Journalists threatened? No problem. It’s far more important in American discourse these days to complain about the “liberal media.” The United States dropped from its 2002 ranking of number 17 to its current neighborhood, where it shares a plot with such bastions of freedom as Botswana, Croatia, and Tonga, resides next to the Dominican Republic and Uruguay and is only two doors down from number 51. . .

Japan.

Unlike the US, Japan doesn’t have a national identity built upon the idea of being the freest of the free. It does, though, ostensibly have a free press. In terms of political or business news, this seems to mean that journalists are free to go home early after filing as stories the press releases given to them by the companies or government agencies they’re covering.

This is the Press Club system. Reporters go to press conferences and are given handouts. This is not a North Korean-style pre-written article, but apparently, rather, a set of key points. As far as I know, there is no direct pressure on reporters or news outlets to run those stories or agree with those points, but direct pressure is seldom needed in the government or large companies, including news agencies, of Japan. Deep digging is not normally a done thing. Investigation is confined largely to consumer issues or acts of individual malfeasance. Corporate or government scandals have to be massive to get attention from major media. Questions that would seem obvious elsewhere are just not asked for if you get kicked out of the Press Club, you are out of the loop.

Reporters Without Borders’ index also mentions rising nationalism, which has been discussed on Seijigiri, as a concern. The offices of the Nihon Keizai Shimbun (or Nikkei), Japan’s counterpart to The Wall Street Journal, were bombed by ultra-rightists (uyoku) and local and regional governments do not seem to enforce noise-pollution, public nuisance, harassment, or public demonstration laws against the uyoku and their infamous black noise trucks. The Tokyo Police Department, though, has defended the offices of the pro-Pyongyang Chongryon group, although it seems they haven’t yet charged those who threatened it. Again, direct pressure and threats not being necessary, knowing that the uyoku are after you and that their behavior is condoned can be all it takes.

Abe-man can save us, though. He can put pressure on lower levels of government to hold ultra-rightists to the same standards as everyone else. When uyoku harass leftist protesters or foreign groups, it is never the uyoku who are forced to leave or the uyoku who are ordered to stay indoors. Rather the targets of the uyoku are kept on buses, indoors, or made to leave, supposedly and believably, for their own safety. Why not remove the troublemakers? Oh, right. They are cut from the same cloth as the PM and almost all of the Government.

Mr. Abe, you’ve taken steps in the right direction in trying to reconcile this country’s differences with its neighbors. How about making Japan a more beautiful country by upholding the ideals set forth on paper in reality?

***

Just to make my patriotic American readers feel a little bit better, the US Extra-territorial ranking (for Puerto Rico, Guam, Saipan, American Samoa, etc.) is 119, which puts us between Kenya and Nigeria. Take pride in your freedom! (Just don’t try writing about much else.)

Listen Now:


icon for podpress  Japan is Falling!: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Related Posts:

6 Comments »

Comments may be subject to moderation and/or approval before appearing. There is no need to post the same comment twice. The site moderator may remove any comment he or she deems inappropriate, without notice.

332

Comment by Ken Worsley

October 28, 2006 @ 7:05 pm

I don’t know what to say, really. In this space, only the tip of the iceberg can be scratched. Both countries ought to be ashamed of themselves, butI’m sure neither are. If questioned about these results, the relevant leaders would be sure to declare the methodology invalid and shoot the messenger.

I don’t see the press situation getting any better. Abe’s already declared that he won’t give the press nearly as much time as Koizumi did, and that he won’t answer any questions while walking.

333

Comment by DeOrio

October 28, 2006 @ 8:06 pm

I agree, Ken. You can see in discussions of these rankings that even the people of the US and Japan are defensive and immediately attack RSF, the group that compiles the Index, as biased. A lot of people draw irrelevant conclusions or attack the press, point to free papers or talk about the worse conditions in other countries. Brining up relative economic weight is also popular.
Perhaps the reason Northern European countries are able to consistently pair high standards of living with high levels of journalistic and lifestyle freedom has to do with a willingness to accept criticism and learn from it instead of reacting in a defensive, almost knee-jerk fashion, refusing to hear any criticism of their societies or their countries.

334

Comment by Ken Worsley

October 28, 2006 @ 8:52 pm

refusing to hear any criticism of their societies or their countries

Perhaps the one strongest thing the top two economies in the world have in common. I would add institutions to that list as well.

Some prefab criticisms I’m sure we’ll hear:

“RSF’s findings are invalid because they’re European and thus have an anti-(American/Japanese) agenda.”

“RSF’s methodology simply makes no sense.”

“The low ranking is the press’ own fault for not properly exercising their freedoms.”

“The media/press in (America/Japan) is to blame for pushing entertainment over serious news. If they’d only focus on the issues, like we wish they would.”

“Who are Europeans to criticize America? Typical European ingratitude.”

“This is a natural consequence of a liberal bias in the media. If the media weren’t run by liberals and bullied by special interest groups, it would be free.”

335

Comment by DeOrio

October 28, 2006 @ 9:35 pm

Sadly, I’ve seen most of those over the last couple of days already.
The liberal thing is big with Americans, so is criticism of RSF for not considering blogging, which is irrelevant as they are concerned with restrictions placed on and threats to professional, primarily print, journalists.
In Japan, I don’t think there’s much awareness of the Index, although it was mentioned on the front page of at least the Japan Times, as a Reuters story, and appeared, although not so prominently in at least one Japanese paper. I don’t think the average Japanese reader takes as much umbrage at the ranking as the average American reader, but would probably just go with the standard, “They don’t understand Japanese systems,” argument.

337

Comment by John Sheridan

October 29, 2006 @ 12:58 am

Seriously, guys - Iceland? Come on…what kind of investigative journalism is going on there that has affected the world like the Pentagon Papers or even what 60 Minutes does? Sure they’re free - they don’t have a government full of idiots to stand up against.

338

Comment by DeOrio

October 29, 2006 @ 4:19 am

I’m sure there are people in Iceland, maybe not many, but some, who grumble about the idiots in their government.
Perhaps not having a government full of idiots up against which to stand (a nod to Churchill, my tongue also firmly in cheek) is what makes their press free.
I would guess that Iceland has something on the order of 60 Minutes, it having such a free press. (Northern European, especially Nordic, countries keep coming up. I’d really appreciate if if anyone who knows more about that part of the world would comment here and straighten me out.) I’d also say that not having their government reach the level of secrecy and corruption of the American government could be a sign that Icelandic journalists are doing something right.
It’s a chicken-and-egg scenario. Does having an open, accountable, honest government lead to a freer press or does having a freer, or more dogged, press lead to better government?
The main point, though, is the RSF Press Freedom Index is not a measure of journalistic accomplishment or quality, but a measure of the restrictions placed on and threats faced by professional print journalists. (I’ve been typing that sentence a lot lately.)
A country could have a press corps consisting entirely of blind, deaf, mute, quadriplaegic, mentally challenged, adamantly pro-government illiterates and rank very highly in the Press Freedom Index. The point is how freely they are allowed to go about their work.
(And I pointed out that string of disabilities as things that would make being a journalist more difficult in combination. I was not implying that people with any one of those disabilities, except maybe being mentally challenged, would be incapable of being a good journalist. Some of my best friends are blind, deaf, mute, quadriplaegic, mentally challenged, adamantly pro-government illiterates.)

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>