<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TPR News: Monday, January 22, 2007 - Scandal, Free Trade, a Slump, and Stupidity</title>
	<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/01/22/tprnews12207/</link>
	<description>Independent Podcasting from Tokyo. Featuring Seijigiri, a discussion of Japanese news and politics, as well as TPR News, our twice a week look at Japan's top stories.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: DeOrio</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/01/22/tprnews12207/#comment-9474</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/01/22/tprnews12207/#comment-9474</guid>
					<description>Well, for actresses I can see it more than for other jobs.  They're often signed and promoted when they're young and it's they're &quot;talents&quot; as opposed to their talent that's important.  Why would a studio want an actress who was not at the peak of her attractiveness if she was never really much of an actress in the first place?

Wait, why would a middle-aged man promoted to his position on the basis of seniority rather than aptitude want a secretary or even an engineer not at the peak of her attractiveness?

Yes, I am saying there are many businessmen who think with the heads to which they pay most attention.  It doesn't matter if they stand a chance or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for actresses I can see it more than for other jobs.  They&#8217;re often signed and promoted when they&#8217;re young and it&#8217;s they&#8217;re &#8220;talents&#8221; as opposed to their talent that&#8217;s important.  Why would a studio want an actress who was not at the peak of her attractiveness if she was never really much of an actress in the first place?</p>
<p>Wait, why would a middle-aged man promoted to his position on the basis of seniority rather than aptitude want a secretary or even an engineer not at the peak of her attractiveness?</p>
<p>Yes, I am saying there are many businessmen who think with the heads to which they pay most attention.  It doesn&#8217;t matter if they stand a chance or not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/01/22/tprnews12207/#comment-9468</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/01/22/tprnews12207/#comment-9468</guid>
					<description>I totally agree. I don't understand for the life of me why once you hit 30 in Japan, particularly as a woman, your deemed difficult to hire.

My wife was working for NHK sorting images and so forth for their internal network database. She could easily be working in a greater position of responsibility but because she was 31 at the time, and deemed possible to get pregnant, they only allowed her a position where anyone could replace her if she had to step out for a few months to give birth. 

That’s happened with many people I’ve met and I don’t understand where the thought process comes from. One would think the older you are, generally speaking, the more life experience and possibly work experience you would have. And yet I see 24 and 25 year olds getting jobs that should given to much more experienced woman who are in their early 30’s. 

As an actress in Japan as well, once you hit 3-0, your career suddenly takes a big spin. Where does this mentality come from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. I don&#8217;t understand for the life of me why once you hit 30 in Japan, particularly as a woman, your deemed difficult to hire.</p>
<p>My wife was working for NHK sorting images and so forth for their internal network database. She could easily be working in a greater position of responsibility but because she was 31 at the time, and deemed possible to get pregnant, they only allowed her a position where anyone could replace her if she had to step out for a few months to give birth. </p>
<p>That’s happened with many people I’ve met and I don’t understand where the thought process comes from. One would think the older you are, generally speaking, the more life experience and possibly work experience you would have. And yet I see 24 and 25 year olds getting jobs that should given to much more experienced woman who are in their early 30’s. </p>
<p>As an actress in Japan as well, once you hit 3-0, your career suddenly takes a big spin. Where does this mentality come from?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DeOrio</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/01/22/tprnews12207/#comment-9372</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 04:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/01/22/tprnews12207/#comment-9372</guid>
					<description>Allowing, not forcing, of course.  I agree with you - the impediments to being a working mother or even, in some cases, a working wife can be high in Japan and the potential rewards are few - there's often a glass ceiling set so low, women can't even stand up straight, much less advance.  This is changing, but slowly.  Child care options, such as expanded facilities or subsidies for childcare would make more sense than one-time payments for having children.  This would also allow capable workers to work now, instead of banking on the potential of future workers, who wouldn't realistically be contributing to the pension fund until people my age were getting set to retire - way too late to deal with the aging baby boomers who are my parents generation.

I would assume that it would be a lot easier and more cost-effective for a company in Japan to take on a mother returning to work or a young guy who spent too much time at 7-11 than it would to, in effect import labor, but a lot of things that I think would make sense are not seen the same way by large Japanese companies.

I don't understand why a woman is suddenly a bad employment choice once she turns 30 or why a 22-year-ld in invariably preferable to a 26-year-old or why a 50-year-old trusted to manage a department at one company can't be trusted to learn a new job.  I also don't understand why a woman would suddenly lose her professional abilities when her boyfriend becomes her husband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allowing, not forcing, of course.  I agree with you - the impediments to being a working mother or even, in some cases, a working wife can be high in Japan and the potential rewards are few - there&#8217;s often a glass ceiling set so low, women can&#8217;t even stand up straight, much less advance.  This is changing, but slowly.  Child care options, such as expanded facilities or subsidies for childcare would make more sense than one-time payments for having children.  This would also allow capable workers to work now, instead of banking on the potential of future workers, who wouldn&#8217;t realistically be contributing to the pension fund until people my age were getting set to retire - way too late to deal with the aging baby boomers who are my parents generation.</p>
<p>I would assume that it would be a lot easier and more cost-effective for a company in Japan to take on a mother returning to work or a young guy who spent too much time at 7-11 than it would to, in effect import labor, but a lot of things that I think would make sense are not seen the same way by large Japanese companies.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand why a woman is suddenly a bad employment choice once she turns 30 or why a 22-year-ld in invariably preferable to a 26-year-old or why a 50-year-old trusted to manage a department at one company can&#8217;t be trusted to learn a new job.  I also don&#8217;t understand why a woman would suddenly lose her professional abilities when her boyfriend becomes her husband.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JS</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/01/22/tprnews12207/#comment-9371</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/01/22/tprnews12207/#comment-9371</guid>
					<description>I didn't realize the number of people working made such a low percentage of the population, but it seems to make sense. The question is, are you talking about forcing women to work or allowing them to work? It seems to me that they don't have much opportunity in terms of professional advancement due to the structure of businesses...and that child care options are limited, if non existent...so do companies see it in their best interest to bring in immigrants or utilize those workers who are already here and are un- or underemployed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t realize the number of people working made such a low percentage of the population, but it seems to make sense. The question is, are you talking about forcing women to work or allowing them to work? It seems to me that they don&#8217;t have much opportunity in terms of professional advancement due to the structure of businesses&#8230;and that child care options are limited, if non existent&#8230;so do companies see it in their best interest to bring in immigrants or utilize those workers who are already here and are un- or underemployed?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/01/22/tprnews12207/#comment-9330</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/01/22/tprnews12207/#comment-9330</guid>
					<description>Someone finally hit the nail on the head over this issue. Unfortunately, the nail doesn't stick up that far in the minds of policymakers.

Great Last Word. The issue continues to get played out as an 'immigration vs. inevitable population decline,' which is terribly unfortunate. 

Still, some bones to pick:

&lt;em&gt;the Japanese are generally hard-working...Just under 40% of Japan’s population works.&lt;/em&gt;

It would help to have some clarification there, I guess. With 20% of the nation now over 60, I find it amazing that so much discrimination against the aged goes on (outside of politics). I remember working somewhere that had a 60 year old mandatory retirement age, except for senior managers. They went bankrupt.

&lt;em&gt;The fact that exceedingly few people decide to have children for financial reasons is but one problem with birth subsidies.&lt;/em&gt;

And, few people even 'decide' to have children. I'd love to see good figured on &lt;em&gt;dekichatta kekkon&lt;/em&gt;.

And I'm not sure if the NEETS and freeters need to be encouraged to work so much as companies need to be encouraged to take them. Japan is not a meritocracy, unless you're already rich. 

The government is discussing passing legislation against having mandatory retirement ages, which I would support. But that alone will make little difference. It is too easy to force unwanted emplyees out of a job in Japan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone finally hit the nail on the head over this issue. Unfortunately, the nail doesn&#8217;t stick up that far in the minds of policymakers.</p>
<p>Great Last Word. The issue continues to get played out as an &#8216;immigration vs. inevitable population decline,&#8217; which is terribly unfortunate. </p>
<p>Still, some bones to pick:</p>
<p><em>the Japanese are generally hard-working&#8230;Just under 40% of Japan’s population works.</em></p>
<p>It would help to have some clarification there, I guess. With 20% of the nation now over 60, I find it amazing that so much discrimination against the aged goes on (outside of politics). I remember working somewhere that had a 60 year old mandatory retirement age, except for senior managers. They went bankrupt.</p>
<p><em>The fact that exceedingly few people decide to have children for financial reasons is but one problem with birth subsidies.</em></p>
<p>And, few people even &#8216;decide&#8217; to have children. I&#8217;d love to see good figured on <em>dekichatta kekkon</em>.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not sure if the NEETS and freeters need to be encouraged to work so much as companies need to be encouraged to take them. Japan is not a meritocracy, unless you&#8217;re already rich. </p>
<p>The government is discussing passing legislation against having mandatory retirement ages, which I would support. But that alone will make little difference. It is too easy to force unwanted emplyees out of a job in Japan.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
