TPR News: Monday, January 29, 2007 - Women are Machines, Kyuma is a Headache, Bird Flu is on the Rise, & more

Filed under: Trans-Pacific Radio, TPR News
Posted by Garrett DeOrio at 1:00 am on Monday, January 29, 2007

In this edition of TPR News, Welfare Minister Yanagisawa joins the gaffe parade, but Defense Minister Kyuma is not to be outdone. Abe continues to leave out the details, the Upper House Vice President resigns amid scandal, Japan tries to protect its whalers, Horiemon says he’s being persecuted, Fujiya gets dirtier, and more fretting about the birthrate.

Politics

In a clever step to improve the beleaguered ruling party’s popularity and to show his understanding side, Minister of Health, Labor, and Welfare Yanagisawa Hakuo lamented the falling birthrate by saying,

“The number of women between the ages of 15 and 50 is fixed. The number of birth-giving machines (and) devices is fixed, so all we can ask is that they do their best per head.”

That’s right, he called women “birth-giving machines” while pushing for people to pull together in what this observer thinks is hardly a crisis, as explained in last week’s edition of TPR News. At least the comment was made for domestic consumption.
D’oh! The story has been picked up by a bit of the Western media, with even blog giant Boing Boing deciding to dedicate a post to the minister’s words, thus raising the question of whether or not Japan’s ministers are aware that in the information age, what they say can make them look bad in more than one country.

Defense Minister Kyuma Fumio, determined to strain Japan-US relations on what appears to be a tenuous grasp of the facts related to his job, has publicly criticized Japan’s closest ally for the second time in a week. This time, Kyuma said, “The United States doesn’t understand (the importance of) spadework,” meaning that the US had been ham-handed in dealing with the relocation of Marine Corps Air Station Futenma in Okinawa. While both governments had agreed on the plan, Kyuma said the US had ignored the objections of Okinawa’s newly-elected Governor Nakaima, who has expressed reservations over the design of the runway at the new base.

After Kyuma’s ill-advised comments on Iraq, which he clarified by blaming it on the translators, US State Department Director of the Office of Japanese Affairs, James Zumwalt, said any further public critical comments could make it difficult to hold the so-called “two plus two” talks between Japan’s Foreign and Defense Ministers and the US’s Secretaries of State and Defense.

Kyuma’s comments have caused concern within the Government, which has said Japan should extend its support to President Bush as an ally in the face of the criticism he faces both at home and abroad. Kyuma showed that he had a handle on government-speak by issuing non-apologies while refraining from sticking his neck out. He said the Cabinet had issued a statement, so he stood by it, while at the same time saying he’d thought something was amiss when the US invaded Iraq (despite apparently not remembering that Japan had supported the invasion.)

In a policy speech on Friday, Prime Minister Abe continued his push for constitutional reform, saying Japan had to put World War II behind it and increase its role in international security, which would entail revision of the Constitution. He also said the country needed to instill patriotism in the classroom and bolster its alliance with the US. (Presumably he has Kyuma working on that.) While Abe repeated his goals and his mantra about a “Beautiful Country,” observers still await more concrete details.

As political scandals expand and engulf both parties, DPJ member and House of Councillors Vice President Tsunoda Giichi stepped down on Friday amid allegations that he had failed to report 25 million yen in political donations. Tsunoda had been subjected pressure from within his own opposition party, which had hoped to focus attention on the financial misdeeds of the ruling LDP in the newly begun ordinary Diet session.

-
Society

The Marmot’s Hole, an excellent blog on all sorts of issues related to life in Korea, has published a piece on the number of foreigners living in Korea. Apparently, 1.84% of Korea’s population is now made up of foreign residents. The raw number of foreigners living in Korea has jumped from 49,500 in 1990 to 891,000 as of November 2006. Government projections claim that the number of foreigners living in Korea is calculated to reach 9.10 million by 2050. The original article, for our Korean-reading listeners, is here.

After New Zealand’s government released Air Force footage of Japanese whalers at work in the Ross Sea, Japan urged them not to reveal the exact location of the vessels, which plan to kill and process 910 Minke and ten Fin whales this year, citing concerns for the safety of the crew. Greenpeace has a ship on the way the Sea to attempt to interpose itself between the whales and whalers and Sea Shepherd has outfitted one of its ships to be able to ram the whalers.

As investigations into the falsified earthquake-resistance data supplied by first-class architect Mizuochi Mitsuo continue, officials in Toyama prefecture, where 119 of his 168 buildings are located, ordered emergency inspections of over 100 of his buildings.

Based on the continuation of the current pension system, the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare projected that pensions might be able to continue to constitute over 51% of income for retirees in the future, but could also slip to as low as 47%, should the birthrate remain at 1.26 per woman. The report concedes that a wide variety of factors - from the country’s economic growth to the birthrate to the wisdom of the investment decisions made could influence that number quite a bit.

In a related story, the same Ministry reported that Japan’s population could drop to 100 million by 2055 if steps were not taken to arrest the declining birthrate. This, of course, does not accout for possible increases in immigration or other such mitigating factors.

The times, they are a-changin’. Remember the good old days of over a century ago when a woman got divorced, had a baby within 300 days of the divorce, and the child was automatically assumed to be her ex-husband’s? Remember ‘em like they were yesterday? Yeah, that’s because that’s still the law. The law, Article 772 of Civil Law, is set for review, though, as cases of separation preceding divorce and premature birth start to cause an increasing number of legal headaches. Why is this even an issue? It’s 2007. Two words: paternity test.

Avian influenza appears to be spreading. The Agriculture Ministry reported that bird flu was suspected in the deaths of 22 chickens in Takahashi, Okayama. The report comes on the heels of the revelation that the recent outbreak in Miyazaki was, in fact, the virulent H5N1 strain. Until tests are confirmed, the Ministry is requesting that farmers not move livestock.

According to a government poll, the percentage of people who said they would support a revision to the Civil Code that would allow married couples to use different surnames decreased by 5.1 percentage points from 2001, while the percentage of those opposed to such a revision increased by a comparable amount. While many respondents said it would be OK for married women to use maiden names as common names, only a fifth of those who supported a revision said they themselves planned to use or used a different surname from their spouses.

This observer’s neighborhood doesn’t count. Despite the fact that I would swear there was an ever-so-faint sprinkling of rather dry snow in Nakano last week, the Meteorological Agency only counts Otemachi and says this year’s mild winter is on pace to have Tokyo’s latest first snowfall since records began to be kept in 1876. The current record-holder is 1960, when the first snow fell on February 10th.

-
Business

Taking advantage of improved political relations in the wake of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s visit to Tokyo in December, Japan and India have made plans to start negotiations on a comprehensive free trade deal next week.

While Japan’s trade with India was a mere $6.2 billion in 2005, not much next to $173.4 billion with China, Japan sees enormous room for growth in India and will seek to begin negotiations with steps such as the reduction of India’s 100% tariff on imported cars. India will seek a loosening of Japanese visa rules for medical professionals and engineers and a reduction in tariffs on products such as shrimp. The deal will be Japan’s eighth trade pact since signing its first with Singapore in 2002.

Fujiya’s dirt continues to pile up as living moth larvae were found in a can of assorted chocolates in Gifu. Despite moths being found in Fujiya’s chocolates in Asahikawa, Hokkaido in 2003 and 2006, the company said the Gifu incident was a strange accident and issued no recall. A spokesman for the company said, “We carry out thorough sanitary management,” which is, if I may be so bold, obviously untrue.

“I found this frightening, I’d been working hard, and it happened so suddenly and without any warning,” said former Livedoor CEO Horie Takafumi, better known as Horiemon, as he shed a tear and explained that he was being persecuted by prosecutors who wanted to take him down a peg by trying him on trumped up charges. The flamboyant celebrity businessman, on trial for using phony companies and other swindles to inflate Livedoor’s stock price, said he was not questioned by Securities officials prior to his arrest, as is standard practice in cases of white collar crime in Japan. If convicted (a near-certainty in any criminal trial in Japan), he’ll face four years in prison.

Last Word

(One of the shortest to date.)

Horiemon is only 34 now. He flew around on a private jet with myriad ladyfriends. He tried to change the way Nippon Pro Baseball did business when he vied for the Sendai franchise that went to his rival Rakuten. He openly criticized those with whom he disagreed. He was one of Koizumi’s “assassins” in the 2005 snap election, although he was not an official LDP candidate, in which he ran against veteran Diet member Kamei Shizuka in Hiroshima. During the campaign, he did what he did best, he mocked Kamei, calling himself richer and better-looking. He lost. Perhaps Horie’s greatest talent was making enemies in high places. Does this have anything to do with the ferocity with which prosecutors have gone after him? I’m not saying it does.

But I’m not saying it doesn’t, either.

Listen Now:


icon for podpress  TPR News: 1/29/07: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Related Posts:

14 Comments »

Comments may be subject to moderation and/or approval before appearing. There is no need to post the same comment twice. The site moderator may remove any comment he or she deems inappropriate, without notice.

Comment by Alex Pappas

January 29, 2007 @ 10:06 am

Birth Giving Machines?? The LDP is already looking like a lame duck government. Now they are really starting to sound like it as well…

Comment by Christopher

January 29, 2007 @ 12:23 pm

He actually apologized though, so I guess that means he’s off the hook, right?

Comment by DeOrio

January 29, 2007 @ 2:02 pm

Yeah. He’s all right now. It’s just that I’m a mean-spirited Japan-basher.

Comment by Lionel Dersot

January 29, 2007 @ 3:30 pm

“D’oh! The story has been picked up by a bit of the Western media, with even blog giant Boing Boing deciding to dedicate a post to the minister’s words, thus raising the question of whether or not Japan’s ministers are aware that in the information age, what they say can make them look bad in more than one country.”

Well, so what? Blog giant is putting a tiny three lines, a quote and a link to a minor blog putting some more lines, a pun, a quote and maybe a link to a clone rehashing the same tongue in cheek stance. All this is so redundant, including Hakuo’s blunder which is not a blunder but mere sincerity that escaped through the curtain of political correctness he has yet to proper manage. What do you expect from geriatric politics Japan? Being hip and hop? Being aware that the Wall Street Journal is listening too? And even if they were aware - some are - does it so much matter?
And is this exceptional and exclusive to Japan by the way? I am at loss at how I would deal with this such no-news if I were a journalist (I used to), but as a reader, I am bored. Any new perspective, journalistic commentary that would go beyond the standard chuckling? In the Nikkei as read on their web site, the brief was funnier because it ended with a sentence saying that no one in the audience reacted. Reacted? Who? How? Why? Throwing fresh Fujiya cream puffs at Hakuo’s face? How many Japanese are really shocked by Hakuo’s stance? Maybe not that many. What does it tell it terms of values? Go and check, make an online opinion pool, come back with some locals feedback, put some meat on that worn out bone, even a thin layer of analysis that goes beyond the mundane backslapping. Maybe the only new thing is that Hakuo’s blunder has been now echoed in hundreds of blogs, and already forgotten. Big deal.

Comment by Ken Worsley

January 29, 2007 @ 4:37 pm

Lionel, I think you have some good points. Unfortunately, a lot of things do fly by in the information age and are quickly forgotten. But I don’t think that makes sexist statements from government ministers any more forgivable.

I think it’s fairly significant that news sources outside of Japan have picked up such statements, even if it’s only three lines (and we considered that before mentioning them). It shows that the world is paying attention in a different way than before. Even ten years ago, that would not have happened.

You’re right, TPR News is not a forum for critical perspectives or analysis; it has never claimed to be. That’s why we run Seijigiri, to break things down and flesh them out a bit more. I wish we had the time to be a bit more contrarian and talk through the news on TPR News, but it is essentially a news broadcast, reporting what’s going on in Japan in English.

Lionel, I would love to be able to do online polls and come back with the results. I really wish we had those kinds of resources at our disposal. It’s something we’re working towards. I’m glad that you see that as a place we could move towards. We intend to, but growth will necessarily be organic (ie, slow) without financial backing.

And is this exceptional and exclusive to Japan by the way?

No, of course not. I don’t think we have ever claimed it was. But with this website’s focus being on Japan, firmly on Japan, we don’t really have the time or space to discuss what goes on in other countries. Again, I wish we did. But, as I said, we focus on Japan, and this happened in Japan, which makes it Japan news.

Thanks for your comment. It’s good to see some thought-provoking feedback!

Comment by J Sheridan

January 29, 2007 @ 6:56 pm

Wait, I don’t get it. A government minister makes sexist remarks and you guys get slammed for reporting it? I think your commenter is very confused. He seems to imply that only Boing-Boing picked up the story in the west. This is in fact, big news. Some news sources that have picked it up: Bloomberg, the AP, the Boston Globe, Reuters, Guardian Unlimited, Forbes, Houston Chronicle, FOX News, New Zealand Herald, The Australian, BBC News…and countless others. To me, it seems significant that a source like Boing-Boing picked it up, since they reach a different readership than the ‘old news’ organizations. They’re not included in a Google News search.

Anyway, thanks guys. I think you give quite a bit more analysis than the media conglomerate (which just reprints AP wires) tends to give. Certainly a lot more food for thought and perspective on the issues.

Comment by Ken

January 29, 2007 @ 7:33 pm

John, I’m not sure if that’s it, but more picking a bone with the fact that Boing-Boing only published a quick summary of the incident. I agree, though, of course it’s relevant. Boing-Boing’s RSS feed has 55,730 subscribers on Bloglines.com alone: more than CNN, the Guardian, Slate or Reuters, to name a few.

Mr Dersot asks, “So what?” of Minister Yanagisawa’s comments, and I think that’s a valid question. The fact is, these comments are projected to have consequences for the Abe administration: Bloomberg is now reporting Abe’s Slide in Polls May Accelerate on `Baby’ Remark. His appointed cabinet members are not helping Mr Abe with his public image, PR or marketing himself as a problem-solver to the public.

I’m not sure how expecting State Ministers to be “hip and hop” translates to expecting them not to make sexist comments. That’s a massive conflation of two unrelated sets of expectations. But, to answer the question:

1) No, I don’t expect them to be ‘hip and hop’

and,

2) I also don’t expect them to make blatant unhelpful, sexist comments. I also expect them to be aware that such comments will damage their credibility, as well as that of the administration’s - and that it doesn’t help with Japan’s image in the international arena.

Comment by DeOrio

January 29, 2007 @ 10:04 pm

I, for one, am pleased to hear what Mr. Dersot had to say. While I agree with you, Ken, that he is both correct in saying we didn’t have much analysis and that TPR News is just a round-up for events in Japan every couple of days, I am also glad to see that other people are thinking about what the deeper implications of the statement might be and that more is expected of TPR in particular.
Now if only we had a budget. . .

Comment by Ken Worsley

January 29, 2007 @ 11:07 pm

I think that’s very true - it’s actually surprising that someone would expect ‘more’ out of a website that’s essentially an all-volunteer operation, started as the hobby of two guys who already have full-time jobs to deal with. But I think that’s a good sign, and I think that some very good ideas have been suggested…

Which is why, with TPR as an all-volunteer operation, I would like to extend an invitation to Mr Dersot to lend a hand in any way he can. Ideas don’t mean much unless they’re put into action, right? So I’d like to see him jump on board and help make TPR the website he’d like to visit…the non-existent deity in the sky known we need all the help we can get. What do you say?

Comment by Lionel Dersot

January 29, 2007 @ 11:37 pm

Dear All,

What has BoingBoing to tell about that event besides copy/pasting words from a news agency and a “cool link” to emptiness? Answer: nothing. Here is a copy/pasting of BoingBoing entry.

“Japan’s health minister: Women are “birth-giving machines”

Japan’s 71-year-old health minister Hakuo Yanagisawa gave a speech in which he called Japanese women “birth-giving machines” and called on them to “do their best per head.”

The number of women aged between 15 and 50 is fixed. Because the number of birth-giving machines and devices is fixed, all we can ask for is for them to do their best per head, although it may not be so appropriate to call them machines. ”

Mr. Sheridan, this commenter being in Japan for more than 20 years is not confused but bored. He wants more than the daily dose of facts without thought, of events that read like puns to forward to the whole department. He wants contexts and analysis and opinions, hopefully not his own, that is, food for the thought, not fillers to guffaw about around the coffee machines. These are aplenty enough already all around.

Ken, I do not support sexist remarks. I do not support either reports on sexist remarks that read like weather reports - and I am not referring to TPR here - that is, devoid of context and perspectives. Sexist remarks are very much prone to happen here in Japan, just like cherry blossoms in Spring. I am no longer satisfied with things like “this remark is ugly”, or “this flower is pretty”. Period. Which also suggests that after +20 years here, I still am craving for the things lacking about Japan’s coverage that I assume you guys at TPR prompted you to start this project. The things lacking are depth, thoughts and perspectives.

And yes, Deorio, all this fussing of mine is indeed about more expectation from TPR in particular. Keep up the good job.

Comment by Ken Worsley

January 29, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

Mr Dersot, I think you’re very right. Thanks for coming back and commenting, and thank you for letting us know what you think and what you think we could do. You’re 100% right - we started this because we think that coverage on Japan (and the region in general) is lacking. That said, one thing that is lacking is a streaming audio/podcast on the news from Japan in English by an independent source. Which is why we do TPR News.

Like you say, it would be better to have more context and perspectives…and I hope we can provide as much as that as possible - within our Seijigiri podcasts.

Comment by Alex

January 30, 2007 @ 5:22 am

I see TPR as a news segment which touches on the weeks major stories. As a news segment it would be difficult to go into full detail simply because of time and audience interest.

Thats what I think is so great about the seijigiri podcasts because its exactly the opposite. It takes news stories and headlines and chews them up and spits them out with two often different perspectives compiling a very detailed look at major issues.

In my opinion I wouldn’t want more detail than is already put into the TPR news stories because I think they should sound and feel like a newscast. Thats just my point of view though.

Comment by Jen

January 31, 2007 @ 10:44 pm

The thing that gets me about it is how he apologised, then tried to backtrack by replacing “birth-giving machines” with “those who have a role in giving birth”. He couldn’t even say “women”. What a man.

Comment by DeOrio

January 31, 2007 @ 11:11 pm

Yep. A fine example of the understanding and PR-savvy displayed by the government in general.

The only reason I can think of for Yanagisawa’s avoidance of the word “women” is a desire to specify women of the proper age and condition for giving birth, as opposed to all women. For purposes of discussing the birthrate, post-menopausal women don’t count - you could have a billion and it wouldn’t change the birthrate.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>