TPR News: Tuesday February 20, 2007 - Abe meets China’s foreign minister, Ishihara’s re-election campaign, bullies, and the Princess Masako book incident

Filed under: Trans-Pacific Radio, TPR News
Posted by Garrett DeOrio at 1:00 am on Tuesday, February 20, 2007

In this edition of TPR News, we look at Tokyo Governor Ishihara Shintaro’s bid for re-election, Japan’s drive to become a permanent member of the UN Security Council, Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhiaoxing’s meeting with Shinzo Abe, and what’s happening to bullies.

Politics

Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhiaoxing met with Prime Minister Abe on Friday and offered China’s help to Japan in resolving the issue of Japanese abducted by North Korea, saying, “I fully understand Japan’s concerns and would like to offer support as much as possible.”

On a less cordial note, Li asked for patience and seriousness in dealing with a dispute over natural gas rights that both countries claim when Abe expressed displeasure of China’s development of gas fields in Japan’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).

The Six Party Talks have dominated foreign policy lately, but, rather than touch on such a complex event here, we ask our readers to listen to the forthcoming Seijigiri #18, in which Ken and Garrett will do their best to dissect the talks and figure out who actually got what in the agreement that emerged.

Tokyo Governor Ishihara Shintaro has apparently decided to go it alone. According to “an LDP member in Tokyo,” in mid-January, the LDP decided to offer Ishihara the party’s support in the upcoming Tokyo gubernatorial election after being approached by one of Ishihara’s contacts. However, last Friday, Ishihara denied that the LDP had made such an offer, saying: “I have been working without any party affiliation. I want to keep that as my principle. I will fight in my own way.” Some observers believe that Ishihara may be trying to distance himself from the increasingly unpopular Abe administration. The Asahi Shimbun hints that this story may not yet be over, writing: “A senior LDP Tokyo metropolitan assembly member suggested…that Ishihara, haunted by his own scandals, may eventually seek LDP support.”

Ishihara’s road to a third term may be a bit easier now that a potential heavyweight challenger seems to no longer be looming on the horizon. DPJ executives announced on Friday that they will not support a run by acting party leader Naoto Kan. Former Miyagi governor Shiro Asano had been asked to run, but has not yet decided whether or not he will.

On February 18, the Yomiuri published an editorial entitled Japan still far from permanent UNSC seat, detailing the difficulties that Japan faces in trying to achieve this goal. In a recent interview published here at TPR, Jun Yanagi, Counselor to the Japanese Embassy of Canada, told Alex Pappas that, “Since [1945] the world has changed a lot. The number of UN Member States has increased and power has shifted a lot. So unless this Security Council is modernized to meet these new challenges, it may not continue to function effectively.”

The Yomiuri’s piece highlights the actions of the Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on reform of the U.N. Security Council, which met for the first time in 2007 last week. The group is comprised of ambassadors from Chile, Croatia, Cyprus, the Netherlands, and Tunisia. Japan’s ambassador to the UN, Kenzo Oshima, attended the meeting and stressed that Japan is still considering active ideas in order to gain its inclusion as a permanent member of the body. The sentiment among members of the OEWG was that of the four nations currently seeking permanent member status (Japan, Brazil, India, and Germany), Japan remains the strongest force pushing for such reform. The United States, however, was the only permanent member of the Security Council to not speak at the OEWG meeting, leading many observers to doubt that the US strongly supports Japan’s bid. Ambassador Oshima expressed the opinion that if reform is not achieved by the beginning of this summer, it could be some time before another chance arises.

According to the Yomiuri, LDP members of Tokyo’s Shinagawa Ward Assembly “have attached sales receipts for comics, detective novels, and even pornography to their funding reports for political research expenses.” Although the assembly does not require members to list the titles of books and periodicals that are purchased for political use. Ward Assembly members were able to discern the titles by examining the ISBN of the items purchased. According to an assembly document, the publications that had been purchased included 11 crime novels, two comics of four-frame cartoons, three comics for boys, four pornographic novels, a book of auto reviews, handbooks on choosing shochu, and manuals on the game of Go. Yasumichi Sudo, the LDP’s chief secretary in the assembly, told the newspaper: “We should have checked how the funds had been used more strictly. As it’s sure the funds had been used for pornographic novels and other unrelated books, we’d like to return the money to the assembly after investigating the receipts closely.”

For those who follow Japanese politics, Adam Richards has published two recent can’t-miss pieces at the Mutant Frog Travelogue. First is his “Highlights from the Diet — Lower House Finance Committee, Feb 12-16 2007,” in which he details the Lower House Budget Comittee, Prime Minister Abe’s reactions to a recent New York Times piece, and the talking-to given to Finance Minister Koji Omi, who brought his daughter along on official business (meetings toward setting up the Okinawa Institute for Science and Technology), with public funds paying for at least a portion of her expenses.

In the second piece, entitled “LDP Relying on Washed-up Celebrities to Lure Upper House Voters,” Adamu introduces us to some of the more colorful characters who are set to run for seats in the Upper House in the upcoming election. One of those profiled is the signer who recorded the Japanese-language version of Ricky Martin’s “La Vida Loca,” and the other is former biker gang leader Keisuke Yoshino. Head over to Mutant Frog to learn more about these characters.

Business and the Economy

A recent book on the life of Princess Masako has caused quite the stir in Japan. After the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Imperial Household Ministry demanded that author Ben Hills apologize for what they called “disrespectful descriptions, distortions of facts and judgmental assertions with audacious conjectures and coarse logic,” Mr Hill responded by telling Kyodo News:

I regard this as an attempt by the Japanese government to suppress and censor my book and I think it is absolutely outrageous. There is nothing to apologise for. In fact, there is only one person in this saga that deserves an apology and that’s Princess Masako. I think the Kunaicho (Imperial Household Agency) should apologise to her for bullying her into a state of nervous breakdown.

Although the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has declined to say which portions of the book it finds to be factually incorrect, the Imperial Household Agency has posted “A letter from the Imperial Household Agency on “Princess Masako” (Ben Hills)” on its website. The letter, which is signed by Grand Chamberlain to His Majesty the Emperor Makoto Watanabe, details the Emperor and Empress’s charity activities and claims that they have been misrepresented by Hills, although no mention is made of Masako. The letter ends with a series of questions:

If all of what the Emperor and Empress do were meaningless formalities, as you seem to imply, why more than seventy-five percent of people constantly support the Imperial Family as it is in public opinion polls? Also, why tens of thousands of local people are willing to come out to welcome the Emperor and Empress along the roads they take wherever they go in the country?

Last Friday, Japanese publishing house Kodansha, which had been set to release the Japanese-language translation of Hills’ book, announced that it would cancel the release. A Foreign Ministry official denied that Kodansha had been contacted by the ministry itself. Kodansha editor Kazunobu Kakishima placed the blame squarely with Hills: “We have come to the conclusion that it is impossible to maintain trustworthy relations with the author and thus we were forced to cancel the book.”

Many speculate that the offending portions of Hills’ book include passages where he asserts that Masako’s child, Princess Aiko, may have been conceived by in vitro fertilization. As Asia Media points out, such claims were commonly made in the foreign press following Aiko’s birth, but not picked up by Japan’s domestic media.

For those interested in what some of the Japan bloggers have to say about the issue, Japan Probe ran a piece earlier today with links to pieces at GlobalTalk 21, durf.org, and Tokyo Mango.

So why is this story in the business section? Because it’s all about the marketing.

In its monthly assessment of the economy, the Cabinet Office announced on Monday that it had no changes in its overall evaluation of economic conditions. The announcement comes on the eve of the Bank of Japan’s February policy meeting, where the BOJ’s governors will decide whether or not to raise Japan’s benchmark interest rates from their current 0.25%. The report essentially said that the economy continues to recover, despite weaknesses in private consumption. Naoki Iizuka, senior economist at Mizuho Securities said:

The government is indirectly and intentionally sending a message to the Bank of Japan that the economy isn’t strong enough to withstand another rate hike. This clear message will be a headwind for the bank to raise rates.

Japan Economy News has pointed out that compared to last month, there seems to be less political pressure on the Bank of Japan, at least in terms of overt statements by government officials. The few comments that have been made, by Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuhisa Shiozaki and Finance Minister Hiroko Ota, have asserted that the Bank of Japan will make its own decisions.

Steel Partners, a US-based hedge fund, said last week it may launch a tender offer to raise its stake in Japanese brewer Sapporo Holdings from about 18.5 percent to 66.6 percent at an estimated cost of 150 billion yen ($1.3 billion). To date, Steel Partners owns stakes of at least five percent in 28 different Japanese companies, with a total investment estimated at 299 billion yen. Some of the companies in its portfolio include Citizen Watch Co. (10.52% ownership), Bull-Dog Sauce Co.(10.15%), Nissin Food Products Co. (9.28%), Brother Industries Ltd. (9.19%), and the Kikkoman Corp. (5.65%).

Late last week, television news in Japan, along with the Nihon Keizai Shimbun, was abuzz with reports that Japan’s No. 1 beer maker Asahi Breweries was considering a white-knight bid to block the investment fund’s takeover of Sapporo. On Saturday, however, Sapporo spokesman Tatsuya Komatsu denied that the company was considering a tie-up deal with Asahi, Kirin, or any other domestic brewery.

At this point, what’s really going on is anyone’s guess: four days ago, Forbes published an article with the headline, “Japan’s Sapporo proposes new anti-takeover measures as US fund mulls offer,” and just yesterday it published the headline, “Japan’s Asahi Breweries to offer tie-up to Sapporo,” which of course runs counter to the article published the day before, in which Sapporo denied that any such deal was in the works. With Sapporo’s annual general meeting coming up on March 29, it should be an eventful next month for the company.

It should be noted that Sapporo and Asahi were formed when the Dai Nippon Beer Co. was broken up in 1949. Dai Nippon Beer’s original factory, which was located in Sumida Ward, Tokyo, was destroyed in the Great Kanto Earthquake of 1923.

Society

In TPR’s first sports report, we are pleased to announce that two friends of TPR, Alex Oke and Adam Gordon, completed the Tokyo Marathon on Sunday, which was run in an icy rain by Adam, Alex, and 29,998 others, including men’s winner Daniel Njenga of Kenya.

Longtime Japan resident and entrepreneur Terrie Lloyd brings up some food for thought in his most recent editorial, Monitoring foreign residents in Japan. Lloyd astutely points out some of the governmental policy contradictions that exist in Japan, and how short-sighted policy decisions can have negative long-term impacts. After detailing the proposed elements of what may become the government’s new immigration policy, Lloyd comes to this conclusion:

Either the current government is becoming xenophobic, and this is being manifested as tighter controls OR maybe they’re preparing the way to substantially increasing the immigrant population. We would like to subscribe to the second theory. However, with the difficulties that minimum language and services rules will impose, it may happen that no foreigner in their right mind will want to come live here after that!

-

At 4:15 p.m. on October 11th of last year, five junior high school boys attacked their classmate, Mori Keisuke, in a bathroom at school and attempted to take his pants off. This may have been the last straw for the boy, frequently bullied according to police. Later that evening, he was dead, having hanged himself in a shed at his family’s home after writing four notes saying,

“I was being bullied, and I can’t live any longer,” and “Bullying is the reason. Good-bye.”

Keisuke’s suicide was one of many that occurred last Fall, when it came to light that school boards and school administrators had been covering up the problem of bullying-related suicides. How many were pushed over the edge before him is unclear, but being investigated.

What gives Keisuke’s suicide an added significance is that prefectural police in Fukuoka delivered papers on three second-year students who bullied Keisuke to prosecutors and referred two 13-year-olds to a child consultation center. In Japan, children must be at least 14 years old at the time of a crime to be prosecuted for it, the Criminal Law and Juvenile Law having been revised six years ago after a spate of juvenile crimes.

All five boys have expressed remorse over the result of their actions and police made a point of saying they sought not to punish the boys, but to ensure their proper future development.

Last Word

This is a positive step, and shows further progress in the area of dealing with bullying, Prime Minister Abe having made the rather obvious decision of advocating the suspension of recidivist bullies recently.

It is only a step, though. The prosecution of the three bullies whoc an be prosecuted should be carried out as aggressively as any other criminal prosecution and their sentence should be as strict as the law allows. Driving a classmate to suicide through relentless, malicious physical and mental assault is not the sort of thing for which adults can give a boy a stern talking-to and hope he’s learned his lesson.

In addition to ensuring the proper development of children, those in positions of authority have a responsibility to send a message, not only to bullies, but to other adults that such behavior unacceptable.

What about the teachers and principals who ignored the plight of victims such as Keisuke? What about the school board members who covered up what was going on? What about teachers who have treated victims as nuisances or even gone so far as to participate in bullying?

It is right to take care of bullies, as they probably have their own problems, but it is not enough. For a message to sink in, adults involved in such situations need to be shown in the strongest possible terms that defending their charges and dealing with a potentially life-threatening problem is not only right, but not optional.

Parents who neglect or abuse children are now prosecuted, there is no reason why school officials or teachers should be exempt.

All parties involved - those who bullied and those complicit in its continuation, need be taught, the hard way, that, in effect, killing someone is not something one lives down.

Listen Now:


icon for podpress  TPR News: 2/20/07: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Related Posts:

16 Comments »

Comments may be subject to moderation and/or approval before appearing. There is no need to post the same comment twice. The site moderator may remove any comment he or she deems inappropriate, without notice.

Comment by ken

February 20, 2007 @ 1:27 am

My father-in-law ran the Tokyo marathon and finished as well. Congrats Kenjiro!

Comment by DeOrio

February 20, 2007 @ 5:57 pm

You should have told me. He could have had his name read over the super-dramatic TPR News theme as well.

Comment by Alex

February 20, 2007 @ 11:32 pm

The Asahi Shimbun hints that this story may not yet be over, writing: “A senior LDP Tokyo metropolitan assembly member suggested…that Ishihara, haunted by his own scandals, may eventually seek LDP support.”

Is it just me or does that sound very yakuza-esk kind of thing to say? The senior LDP member is basically saying once he needs a boost in the polls, he\’ll come crawling to us… Not sure what to make of that.

Ok here\’s a \”What If\” scenario. If Ishihara was an American politician, and his views were the same only slanted to an American point of view, do you think he could be elected?

I ask because I\’m curious if his values and values of say your average American Republican might be similar.

Comment by Alex

February 20, 2007 @ 11:33 pm

Oops sorry I put the above all in Italics.. Ugh.. Sorry about that.

Comment by DeOrio

February 21, 2007 @ 1:51 am

I think Ishihara has some views, put in an American context, that would make him economically similar to some Democrats and socially similar to some Republicans, but by no means the average Republican.

I think it would be a lot harder for Ishihara to win a position equivalent to the one he holds here in the US.

Comment by Alex

February 21, 2007 @ 4:32 am

Interesting. I’m afraid I’m not terribly familiar with the differences between Democrats and Republican asides from the obvious issues (Abortion, Gun control, and so on).

I looked online for more details on his political beliefs and here’s what I found:

He has called for pre-emptive strikes on Beijing and Pyongyang on more than one occasion, usually during live television interviews. In 1995 he claimed that the Nanjing Massacre was a fiction and merely Chinese propaganda.

I had no idea he called Nanjing ‘fiction’. Yikes. So would Ishihara winning his upcoming campaign signal that there is still support for his ideals or is simply a case that voters know him and are comfortable with him and his platform?

My wife voted him last time he was running. And even to her, she isn’t sure what makes him so popular. I’m sure though she didn’t know about the above.

Comment by yellowpeep

February 21, 2007 @ 3:44 pm

Alex,
Partly because Ishihara’s brother was a famous and charismatic actor who had passed away. Another reason is that he is conservative. Before his regime, the governer, Minobe, let Tokyo ruined with rogue foreigners, unnplanned public projects, and enlarged labor unions.

As Ishihara points outs, Nanjing is a total propaganda from Chinese communists. Here’s a case in point. Is Iraq war an invasion, right? Rapes and killing children or women actually happened. So I’ll call it “Iraq massacre” from now on. If you deny it, prove that no rape or murder occurred.

Comment by Ken Worsley

February 21, 2007 @ 11:24 pm

Yellowpeep, I see your points but there are some huge problems with your logic. First, as someone who opposes the Iraq war, I don’t have any interest in what you call it.

But the main point is that is simply isn’t relevant. Alex is talking about Ishihara’s comments on the “Nanking Incident,” “Nanking Massacre” or “Rape of Nanking.” Again, what we choose to call it does not change what actually happened.

When discussing one incident, and debating over what happened during the course of that incident, bringing up other incidents is a diversionary tactic and a logical fallacy. No one here is going to fall for that.

Comment by DeOrio

February 22, 2007 @ 1:24 am

I was always more a fan of the Cowardly Lion than the Straw Man.

Comment by yellowpeep

February 22, 2007 @ 2:07 pm

Ken,
I was just teasing. I don’t want to have an argument with Alex. In the first place, he’s not saying anything wrong.

The reason I brought up Iraq is to remind of a significance of various perspectives. My previous post obviously biased, being lack of criticism against the dictator’s regime. The recent terrorisms have been killed many civilians, and one may say that US is striving to maintain a peace. Accusing of US with just pictures of tortures or dead babies may not only agitate people but also prevent the world from making a rational discussion. Therefore, if a country in the later period ever makes a film on “Iraq’s massacre” and starts a one-sided story, you should stand up and defend your father.

So, going back to Nanjing, one should neutrally see that incident, listening to minority, too. US citizens tend to jump at crimes of Imperial Japanese possibly because they may overshadow what US did at that time. Knowing that Japanese rightists are in the side of minority in the world, their claim is still worth hearing. I’m recently scared of the attitude of US, a little bit judgemental one as far as I see a public hearing on “comfort women”, too. (The people here in this blog seem to have a very good discussion on the contrary.) Is freedom of speech really maintained in US?

If Chinese intentionally raised the number of victims, it’s natural to question it and ask for cooperative search together with China. Apology can be done after reaching truth. Someone may say that “it’s not a matter of the number.” However, those who say that typially don’t notice Tongzhou incident where Japanese were raped and massacred prior to Nanjing. History is a chain of causality, that may be a result of amplification of hatred. It’s not easy to judge like “He’s evil.” Dualism is easy, though. I’d be happy if US people have ever investigated Sino-Japanese war even a little bit and make a speech.

I may not fully support what Ishihara says, but not accept all the claims from Chinese communism, either.

Hoping you find any relevancy.

Well, my story is diverting from your topic, so I’m out. Nice blog, BTW. Enjoy staying in Japan. Speak Japanese and read Japanese if you wanted to be treated as a grown-up or understand the opinion of silent majority, not of mass media like Asahi.com. That’s a tough work to know Japan beyond mass media’s filter.

Comment by Ken

February 22, 2007 @ 5:30 pm

Yellowpeep - Thanks for the comments and the kind words…

US citizens tend to jump at crimes of Imperial Japanese possibly because they may overshadow what US did at that time.

Certainly…that’s one point I agree with very strongly. Every nation has its selective memory, and its very easy for the ‘winner’ to go on thinking that his or her nation did everything right.

I’m one of the first to say that China has used the issue to further their political agenda, but that’s hardly surprising…

Enjoy staying in Japan. Speak Japanese and read Japanese if you wanted to be treated as a grown-up or understand the opinion of silent majority, not of mass media like Asahi.com.

Interesting viewpoint. I’m not staying here, I’m living here, have been for a long time, I own a Japanese company and I’m fully fluent in both spoken and written Japanese.

And you might want to take your own advice, should you ever come to Japan. I wonder if you get much chance to use Japanese over in Norfolk, Virginia? ;)

Comment by yellowpeep

February 23, 2007 @ 12:01 pm

You so crossed the line! You say you’re broadcasting from Tokyo. My assuming that you’re living in Japan doesn’t mean I’m not betraying your privacy. Erase your previous comment about my privacy, please.

私も幸いながら日本語にはあまり不自由しません。まぁ日本人だから当たり前ですけど。最近のホットな話題は極右政党が誕生しそうだというものです。ここの番組でも是非とも取り上げてくださいよ。さまざまな勢力との癒着が薄いので、日本に変革をもたらすことが有望視されています。今度の参院選で失敗すれば元も子もないんですけどね。
 わたしゃ口は悪いけど、意地悪なやりとりはしたくないです。もう一度言いますけど、すぐにでもコメント欄を消しといてくださいませ。ではまた。

Comment by Ken

February 23, 2007 @ 4:04 pm

Yellowpeep, sorry…not sure what you are talking about with privacy…

Comment by John S

February 23, 2007 @ 11:34 pm

I read that Terrie Lloyd article. I think he’s right, but I’m not sure if the government is that planned out. I think they’re just responding to stimuli. They hear it’s dangerous and there’s foreign crime and so they want a way to monitor the community better. They should have one anyway, the current system is a joke.

Comment by DeOrio

February 24, 2007 @ 1:56 pm

Yellowpeep, shoot me an e-mail - transpacificradio(at)gmail(dot)com. Let’s get this sorted out in a more appropriate venue.

Comment by DeOrio

February 24, 2007 @ 1:58 pm

John,
For the most part I agree with you. I do, though, think that the government is more than happy to believe there’s an increase in foreign crime because it reinforces their beliefs as individuals.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>