<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Questioned About Abe&#8217;s Stance on the &#8216;Comfort Women&#8217; Issue at a Regular Press Conference</title>
	<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/</link>
	<description>Independent Podcasting from Tokyo. Featuring Seijigiri, a discussion of Japanese news and politics, as well as TPR News, our twice a week look at Japan's top stories.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: The Hedging That Forgives : Left Flank</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-48835</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-48835</guid>
					<description>[...] Say what you might about how ineptly Japan&amp;#8217;s PM Shinzo Abe is governing or handling the &amp;#8220;comfort women&amp;#8221; issue and similar topics for apology, but it might not really matter as much as ideology or geopolitics. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Say what you might about how ineptly Japan&#8217;s PM Shinzo Abe is governing or handling the &#8220;comfort women&#8221; issue and similar topics for apology, but it might not really matter as much as ideology or geopolitics. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DeOrio</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-38044</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 04:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-38044</guid>
					<description>You're right on, Ken - my Yasukuni strategy (don't go, don't talk about it, don't respond to criticism - pretend it's not happening) could be used here, too.  The &lt;em&gt;kantei&lt;/em&gt; should just pretend it's not happening.  If they can do it with actual problems facing Japan, like pension frailty, they can do it with a non-binding resolution from an ally who is never, ever going to even consider the possibility of trying to enforce it, which would be impossible anyway.

Even if this does pass, it will be quickly forgotten.  Japan should have learned by now that these things are not really about getting apologies, they're about embarrassing Japan.  There is nothing Japan can do that will end it (although it would help a lot if the PM would keep his borderline denials and thinly-veiled ultranationalism at home.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right on, Ken - my Yasukuni strategy (don&#8217;t go, don&#8217;t talk about it, don&#8217;t respond to criticism - pretend it&#8217;s not happening) could be used here, too.  The <em>kantei</em> should just pretend it&#8217;s not happening.  If they can do it with actual problems facing Japan, like pension frailty, they can do it with a non-binding resolution from an ally who is never, ever going to even consider the possibility of trying to enforce it, which would be impossible anyway.</p>
<p>Even if this does pass, it will be quickly forgotten.  Japan should have learned by now that these things are not really about getting apologies, they&#8217;re about embarrassing Japan.  There is nothing Japan can do that will end it (although it would help a lot if the PM would keep his borderline denials and thinly-veiled ultranationalism at home.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ken Worsley</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-38004</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 02:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-38004</guid>
					<description>Ponta, I don't know who would win or lose...it's kind of hard to say.

But, first: I don't think this resolution has a chance of passing. A lot of reps will think hard about voting 'yay' on this one. A lot of folks will be absent from the chamber that day or abstain from voting. They will be lobbied &lt;em&gt;hard&lt;/em&gt;. I'm sure Bob Mitchel will come in with dinners, speeches, the whole nine yards. 

Second: Even if it does pass, it's obviously non-binding. Japan will just be shocked by the lack of power and influence it now possesses in the Democratic House. No surprises there.

Once again: I can't believe they didn't have a contingency plan, or way to divert media attention. Anything would be good. Have Madonna come over and adopt a baby. Maybe one from the new baby drop in Fukuoka. What? What resolution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ponta, I don&#8217;t know who would win or lose&#8230;it&#8217;s kind of hard to say.</p>
<p>But, first: I don&#8217;t think this resolution has a chance of passing. A lot of reps will think hard about voting &#8216;yay&#8217; on this one. A lot of folks will be absent from the chamber that day or abstain from voting. They will be lobbied <em>hard</em>. I&#8217;m sure Bob Mitchel will come in with dinners, speeches, the whole nine yards. </p>
<p>Second: Even if it does pass, it&#8217;s obviously non-binding. Japan will just be shocked by the lack of power and influence it now possesses in the Democratic House. No surprises there.</p>
<p>Once again: I can&#8217;t believe they didn&#8217;t have a contingency plan, or way to divert media attention. Anything would be good. Have Madonna come over and adopt a baby. Maybe one from the new baby drop in Fukuoka. What? What resolution?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ponta</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37826</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37826</guid>
					<description>Ken 
I am not sure.
 By a Japanese diet member  proposing such a measure or Japan going tit-for-tat, who is winner? Maybe China and Korea and possibly Russia. Who is loser, Japan and the US.
 By ignoring the resolution, who is winner? ---I am not sure---Many Koreans and Korean Americans will be beating their chest but that is what they've been doing anyway. By the resolution alone, it won't  change the policy on international relation with Japan on the US side, so Japan is not a loser in substance at least. 

It might be a just symbolic victory for Mike Honda for his American constituents, but I think it will be symbolic for many Japanese when considering the US-Japan relations.

Anyway, I think Japanese government should use more soft-power in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken<br />
I am not sure.<br />
 By a Japanese diet member  proposing such a measure or Japan going tit-for-tat, who is winner? Maybe China and Korea and possibly Russia. Who is loser, Japan and the US.<br />
 By ignoring the resolution, who is winner? &#8212;I am not sure&#8212;Many Koreans and Korean Americans will be beating their chest but that is what they&#8217;ve been doing anyway. By the resolution alone, it won&#8217;t  change the policy on international relation with Japan on the US side, so Japan is not a loser in substance at least. </p>
<p>It might be a just symbolic victory for Mike Honda for his American constituents, but I think it will be symbolic for many Japanese when considering the US-Japan relations.</p>
<p>Anyway, I think Japanese government should use more soft-power in the future.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37793</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37793</guid>
					<description>Ponta,

I posed the question because I think that's the standard political response: Japan is cornered and the passage of this bill would be a checkmate on Japan, squeezed between the US and China/Korea.

Still, I think one Japanese member of the diet could propose such a measure. After all, Mike Honda is just one man in the House of Representatives (I know that similar bills have been introduced and shot down before, but they're done and gone).

If Japan went tit-for-tat, I wonder if that might get the Americans (ahem, the Democrats) to reign in their own. Perhaps not. I think it becomes problematic when our countries remain fixated at slinging political mud at each other rather than working toward a future we should be excellent in together. 

That said, the comfort women issue will need to be resolved somehow, someday. Playing the 'wait till they die' game is politically bankrupt. It may even backfire in a wave of resentment. I do find it surprising that given the Democratic Party's ascension to control in the Congress that the LDP did not have a contingency plan to deal with this inevitability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ponta,</p>
<p>I posed the question because I think that&#8217;s the standard political response: Japan is cornered and the passage of this bill would be a checkmate on Japan, squeezed between the US and China/Korea.</p>
<p>Still, I think one Japanese member of the diet could propose such a measure. After all, Mike Honda is just one man in the House of Representatives (I know that similar bills have been introduced and shot down before, but they&#8217;re done and gone).</p>
<p>If Japan went tit-for-tat, I wonder if that might get the Americans (ahem, the Democrats) to reign in their own. Perhaps not. I think it becomes problematic when our countries remain fixated at slinging political mud at each other rather than working toward a future we should be excellent in together. </p>
<p>That said, the comfort women issue will need to be resolved somehow, someday. Playing the &#8216;wait till they die&#8217; game is politically bankrupt. It may even backfire in a wave of resentment. I do find it surprising that given the Democratic Party&#8217;s ascension to control in the Congress that the LDP did not have a contingency plan to deal with this inevitability.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DeOrio</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37791</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37791</guid>
					<description>I think what we're really looking at here is a difference in political systems. In the US, it pays to pander to your constituents, in Japan, well. . . not as much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what we&#8217;re really looking at here is a difference in political systems. In the US, it pays to pander to your constituents, in Japan, well. . . not as much.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ponta</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37774</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37774</guid>
					<description>Ken
Thanks.
I think the overthinker on Japan Probe gave me the best response Japan should take;黙殺
http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=1318#
The US is too important for Japan to do  tit-for-tat.
But note the blogger is pro-American, at least he was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken<br />
Thanks.<br />
I think the overthinker on Japan Probe gave me the best response Japan should take;黙殺<br />
<a href='http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=1318#' rel='nofollow'>http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=1318#</a><br />
The US is too important for Japan to do  tit-for-tat.<br />
But note the blogger is pro-American, at least he was.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37740</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37740</guid>
					<description>Ponta, I think a lot of people do. Politicians, of course, pick and choose their battles according to political expediency, as Mike Honda has often been accused of doing. 

So, that post would make me raise the question: When will the Japanese government put forth a motion asking the US Government to recognize and apologize for the 特殊慰安施設協会?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ponta, I think a lot of people do. Politicians, of course, pick and choose their battles according to political expediency, as Mike Honda has often been accused of doing. </p>
<p>So, that post would make me raise the question: When will the Japanese government put forth a motion asking the US Government to recognize and apologize for the 特殊慰安施設協会?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ponta</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37731</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37731</guid>
					<description>Here is what Japanese popular blogger has to say about the US resolution.
http://banmakoto.air-nifty.com/blues/2007/03/post_fe6a.html
I don't entirely agree with him, but I share the sentiment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is what Japanese popular blogger has to say about the US resolution.<br />
<a href='http://banmakoto.air-nifty.com/blues/2007/03/post_fe6a.html' rel='nofollow'>http://banmakoto.air-nifty.com/blues/2007/03/post_fe6a.html</a><br />
I don&#8217;t entirely agree with him, but I share the sentiment.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Japan News for March 12, 2007 &#187; Japan Probe</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37377</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/03/12/ministry-of-foreign-affairs-questioned-about-abes-stance-on-the-comfort-women-issue-at-a-regular-press-conference/#comment-37377</guid>
					<description>[...] Trans-Pacific Radio has posted an interesting selection from a transcript of the March 9, 2007 press conference at Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where the issue of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s stance on the 1993 ‘Kono Statement’ regarding the issue of ‘comfort women’ was raised by a reporter. [Link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Trans-Pacific Radio has posted an interesting selection from a transcript of the March 9, 2007 press conference at Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where the issue of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s stance on the 1993 ‘Kono Statement’ regarding the issue of ‘comfort women’ was raised by a reporter. [Link] [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
