<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ishihara gets a third term, DPJ makes gains in prefectural assemblies, a record number of women are elected, and Lindsay Ann Hawker&#8217;s killer still at large - TPR News: Wednesday, April 11, 2007</title>
	<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/</link>
	<description>Independent Podcasting from Tokyo. Featuring Seijigiri, a discussion of Japanese news and politics, as well as TPR News, our twice a week look at Japan's top stories.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: DeOrio</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/#comment-72795</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 06:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/#comment-72795</guid>
					<description>We're glad you're becoming more interested in Japanese news, Deas - that's one of our main goals here - to spark or further an interest in Japanese news and politics by making them more accessible.

As for Ishihara, he's right to take the reins, but I haven't seen much follow-through.  Will the replacement tress get planted or will we start to see more condos at Okutama?  Will anything happen?

Ishihara said Tsukiji was old.  He wanted to move it to Odaiba to face the Bay.  Now, Tsukiji is one of Tokyo's most popular tourist attractions in addition to having historical and commercial significance.  At the same time that he wants to move Tsukiji out of an older, less wealthy neighborhood, he talks about helping people and about increasing tourism to Tokyo with the Olympics.
Moving Tsukiji would end its tourist appeal and leave another area of Tokyo's older East side with not a whole lot going for it.

The Olympics are a terrible idea - the only benefit will be to Ishihara's vanity.  The city will lose money, green space, and even more of the scant scenic beauty it has.  We'll get more highway overpasses that won't really bring anything good.  Making more space for people to drive in a city where fewer people should be driving is NOT the answer and will NOT help.
If Ishihara thinks young people will fall in line, start working harder, and be more like him just because the Olympics come to Tokyo, he understands neither his constituents nor the Olympics.  In 1964, it made a lot of sense, now the Olympics would be a burden and a nuisance to Tokyo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re glad you&#8217;re becoming more interested in Japanese news, Deas - that&#8217;s one of our main goals here - to spark or further an interest in Japanese news and politics by making them more accessible.</p>
<p>As for Ishihara, he&#8217;s right to take the reins, but I haven&#8217;t seen much follow-through.  Will the replacement tress get planted or will we start to see more condos at Okutama?  Will anything happen?</p>
<p>Ishihara said Tsukiji was old.  He wanted to move it to Odaiba to face the Bay.  Now, Tsukiji is one of Tokyo&#8217;s most popular tourist attractions in addition to having historical and commercial significance.  At the same time that he wants to move Tsukiji out of an older, less wealthy neighborhood, he talks about helping people and about increasing tourism to Tokyo with the Olympics.<br />
Moving Tsukiji would end its tourist appeal and leave another area of Tokyo&#8217;s older East side with not a whole lot going for it.</p>
<p>The Olympics are a terrible idea - the only benefit will be to Ishihara&#8217;s vanity.  The city will lose money, green space, and even more of the scant scenic beauty it has.  We&#8217;ll get more highway overpasses that won&#8217;t really bring anything good.  Making more space for people to drive in a city where fewer people should be driving is NOT the answer and will NOT help.<br />
If Ishihara thinks young people will fall in line, start working harder, and be more like him just because the Olympics come to Tokyo, he understands neither his constituents nor the Olympics.  In 1964, it made a lot of sense, now the Olympics would be a burden and a nuisance to Tokyo.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Deas</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/#comment-72653</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 02:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/#comment-72653</guid>
					<description>See, this is the kind of stuff that I never paid attention to before. I'm glad I found this site. I'm becoming more and more interested in Japanese news that used to be pretty cryptic to me. (My newspaper reading is poor and seriously labored.) I see your point about the kafunsho problem and how the local government is better suited to dealing with it. I'm still confused about moving the Tsukiji fish market - I don't understand the purpose, I guess. It seems pretty lively as it is. And I guess I am mostly still baffled about the Olympics though. Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, this is the kind of stuff that I never paid attention to before. I&#8217;m glad I found this site. I&#8217;m becoming more and more interested in Japanese news that used to be pretty cryptic to me. (My newspaper reading is poor and seriously labored.) I see your point about the kafunsho problem and how the local government is better suited to dealing with it. I&#8217;m still confused about moving the Tsukiji fish market - I don&#8217;t understand the purpose, I guess. It seems pretty lively as it is. And I guess I am mostly still baffled about the Olympics though. Why?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/#comment-72021</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/#comment-72021</guid>
					<description>Deas, one of the few things I like about Ishihara is his almost federalist approach to governing. He's not afraid to say that the central government fails to take care of problems on the prefectural level, despite the fact that the central government wields great power by proxy through the various ministries. I think he's right that problems such as Kafunsho are best dealt with by loose associations of governors and prefectural assembly members, and not by the 農林水産省 (The Ministry of Agricultre, Forestry, and Fisheries). What have they done about the problem? In the interview, when he's talking about Kafunsho, you can hear him ask, &quot;何をしましたか、国は？何もしていないじゃないですか？&quot; What has the county (national government) done? Are they not doing nothing?

Ishihara could have dug in much, much deeper here. Here is the page for the MAFF's &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/puresu/H19-4gatu/0406kahun-pt.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pollen Outbreak Counter-Measure Team&lt;/a&gt;&quot; They plan on having requests for budgetary allocations for fiscal 2008? That's the final goal in their schedule.

This is party why when Ishihara gets an axe, heads out into Okutama and chops down trees himself, people notice. Over at the Ministry, Matsuoka Daijin seems more concerned with covering up his scandals and coming up with harebrained schemes for approving Japanese restaurants overseas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deas, one of the few things I like about Ishihara is his almost federalist approach to governing. He&#8217;s not afraid to say that the central government fails to take care of problems on the prefectural level, despite the fact that the central government wields great power by proxy through the various ministries. I think he&#8217;s right that problems such as Kafunsho are best dealt with by loose associations of governors and prefectural assembly members, and not by the 農林水産省 (The Ministry of Agricultre, Forestry, and Fisheries). What have they done about the problem? In the interview, when he&#8217;s talking about Kafunsho, you can hear him ask, &#8220;何をしましたか、国は？何もしていないじゃないですか？&#8221; What has the county (national government) done? Are they not doing nothing?</p>
<p>Ishihara could have dug in much, much deeper here. Here is the page for the MAFF&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/puresu/H19-4gatu/0406kahun-pt.html" rel="nofollow">Pollen Outbreak Counter-Measure Team</a>&#8221; They plan on having requests for budgetary allocations for fiscal 2008? That&#8217;s the final goal in their schedule.</p>
<p>This is party why when Ishihara gets an axe, heads out into Okutama and chops down trees himself, people notice. Over at the Ministry, Matsuoka Daijin seems more concerned with covering up his scandals and coming up with harebrained schemes for approving Japanese restaurants overseas.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Deas</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/#comment-71614</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/#comment-71614</guid>
					<description>Great report! Listened to it while biking to my base school today. I'm glad you mentioned that Daily Mail article.

Also - I had no idea about probably half of the campaign promises that Ishihara made. Moving Tsukiji to face Tokyo Bay? What? The pollen extermination plan I knew about, as well as the idea to bid for Tokyo to host the 2016 Olympic Games, but some of the other stuff in there is really interesting. Is it a good or a bad thing that he does his own thing in the face of the central government? Fascinating stuff. 

(By the way, I'm still sad that Dr. Nakamats[u] didn't win the Tokyo gubernatorial race. I really wanted to see his magic missile defense system. In fact, I vote that he rolls that sucker out anyway. He can profit monetarily and Japan and South Korea can profit defensively from his zany inventions. Ha ha.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great report! Listened to it while biking to my base school today. I&#8217;m glad you mentioned that Daily Mail article.</p>
<p>Also - I had no idea about probably half of the campaign promises that Ishihara made. Moving Tsukiji to face Tokyo Bay? What? The pollen extermination plan I knew about, as well as the idea to bid for Tokyo to host the 2016 Olympic Games, but some of the other stuff in there is really interesting. Is it a good or a bad thing that he does his own thing in the face of the central government? Fascinating stuff. </p>
<p>(By the way, I&#8217;m still sad that Dr. Nakamats[u] didn&#8217;t win the Tokyo gubernatorial race. I really wanted to see his magic missile defense system. In fact, I vote that he rolls that sucker out anyway. He can profit monetarily and Japan and South Korea can profit defensively from his zany inventions. Ha ha.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rocking in Hakata</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/#comment-71612</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/#comment-71612</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stalking Bandwagon...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ok - let me just say, in defense of Japanese men, that they are not all freaky, perverted, and exponentially randier with every year they add to their lives. But you sure would think otherwise if you followed some foreign media coverage after the recen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stalking Bandwagon&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ok - let me just say, in defense of Japanese men, that they are not all freaky, perverted, and exponentially randier with every year they add to their lives. But you sure would think otherwise if you followed some foreign media coverage after the recen&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ken Y-N</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/#comment-71601</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 23:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/11/ishihara-elections-women-candidates-lindsay-ann-hawker/#comment-71601</guid>
					<description>I've not listened to the podcast yet, but skimming the article I don't see what I want to see, namely exit polls from Ishihara's victory that give an age profile of those who backed him. Conventional gaijin wisdom says that only old folk vote for him, although I suspect this to be false, and in fact I think his main voter base is women. Can you find out these numbers?

Second, I hoped he would have lost, if only to force foreigners (and ex-foreigners) to think more constructively, rather than just using Ishihara as an Aunt Sally to blame all wrongs (and perceived wrongs) on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve not listened to the podcast yet, but skimming the article I don&#8217;t see what I want to see, namely exit polls from Ishihara&#8217;s victory that give an age profile of those who backed him. Conventional gaijin wisdom says that only old folk vote for him, although I suspect this to be false, and in fact I think his main voter base is women. Can you find out these numbers?</p>
<p>Second, I hoped he would have lost, if only to force foreigners (and ex-foreigners) to think more constructively, rather than just using Ishihara as an Aunt Sally to blame all wrongs (and perceived wrongs) on.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
