<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Head wind for Japanese change</title>
	<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/23/japan-constitutional-reform/</link>
	<description>Independent Podcasting from Tokyo. Featuring Seijigiri, a discussion of Japanese news and politics, as well as TPR News, our twice a week look at Japan's top stories.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/23/japan-constitutional-reform/#comment-84415</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/23/japan-constitutional-reform/#comment-84415</guid>
					<description>I'm not really sure that I see the connection between Abe's bill setting the rules for a national referendum on constitutional amendments and public opinion figures over hypothetical (or suggested) amendments. Are there polls on how many support or oppose making legal the mechanism to enact constitutional amendments?

&lt;em&gt;As for war-renouncing Article 9 as a whole, 44.5% of the pollees replied that they saw no need to revise the article while only 25% replied that it should be revised.&lt;/em&gt;

What's in the gap there? &quot;I don't know&quot; or &quot;No answer?&quot; I'd love to see how that breaks down...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not really sure that I see the connection between Abe&#8217;s bill setting the rules for a national referendum on constitutional amendments and public opinion figures over hypothetical (or suggested) amendments. Are there polls on how many support or oppose making legal the mechanism to enact constitutional amendments?</p>
<p><em>As for war-renouncing Article 9 as a whole, 44.5% of the pollees replied that they saw no need to revise the article while only 25% replied that it should be revised.</em></p>
<p>What&#8217;s in the gap there? &#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8221; or &#8220;No answer?&#8221; I&#8217;d love to see how that breaks down&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ohta</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/23/japan-constitutional-reform/#comment-84162</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/23/japan-constitutional-reform/#comment-84162</guid>
					<description>Please vote!

International Poll on the bill to amend the Constitution of Japan
http://blog.kansai.com/MediaAction</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please vote!</p>
<p>International Poll on the bill to amend the Constitution of Japan<br />
<a href='http://blog.kansai.com/MediaAction' rel='nofollow'>http://blog.kansai.com/MediaAction</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Japan News for April 24, 2007 &#187; Japan Probe</title>
		<link>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/23/japan-constitutional-reform/#comment-81924</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.transpacificradio.com/2007/04/23/japan-constitutional-reform/#comment-81924</guid>
					<description>[...] While Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe&amp;#8217;s ruling coalition may seem to be cruising easily toward the first revision of the country&amp;#8217;s postwar pacifist constitution, it has encountered an unexpected head wind - a decline in public support for the move. [Link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] While Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe&rsquo;s ruling coalition may seem to be cruising easily toward the first revision of the country&rsquo;s postwar pacifist constitution, it has encountered an unexpected head wind - a decline in public support for the move. [Link] [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
