US House Committee Passes Sex Slave Resolution; Measure Heads to Full House

Filed under: Japan in the News
Posted by Ken Worsley at 1:09 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2007

What happens when you take out full page ads in US newspapers attempting to put forward the ‘Show us the proof!’ line of argument concerning WW2-era sex slaves and then have a sitting lawmaker announce, “We are absolutely positive that there was no massacre in Nanking,” to the world?

You end up pouring gas on a fire. I actually did this once, when I was ten or so years old. I learned, in a flash, that it was a bad idea. These are grown men who cannot comprehend the concept of pouring gas on a fire in the international public relations arena.

Back in January, before Prime Minister Shinzo Abe pushed the issue to the front page of newspapers all over the world, it was doubtful that Representative Mike Honda’s nonbinding resolution would come to vote in the committee, much less get passed on to the full floor of the House of Representatives for debate.

That’s exactly what happened today.

On Tuesday US time, the resolution introduced by Japanese-American lawmaker Mike Honda was approved 39 to 2 by the U.S. House of Representatives International Relations Committee in a step that allows the nonbinding measure to move to the full House.

39 to 2. The opposition to Honda’s bill only managed a safety.

This is a significant result, yet it does not mean that the resolution has been passed by the full House. It will have to be debated and brought to a vote. It can still be killed; the Japan lobby will no doubt swing into full gear in an attempt to have this bill not get passed, as they did last year with House Resolution 759.

Last time, former Congressman Bob Michel, working with legal and lobby firm Hogan and Hartson, convinced US lawmakers not to pass the resolution.

Representative Tom Lantos, the committee chairman, said that Japan is “our greatest friend in Asia and one of our closest partners in the world. Yet, Japan’s refusal to make an official government apology to the women who suffered as so-called ‘comfort women’ is disturbing to all who value this relationship.”

Mike Honda himself had this to say:

What they said today in their vote was that, yes, there were victims, there were women who were used as sex slaves, yes, there was a systematic military program that captured, coerced women and girls to be used as sex slaves…It is time that the Japanese government approach and acknowledge, take full responsibility and apologize in an unambiguous, formal way.

Whether Japan has or has not actually made an adequate apology (which has been debated much on these pages) is not the issue. It’s the perception. It’s the public relations.

And Japan is losing that game.

Maybe some good will come of this, and the Japanese government will learn how to do public relations properly, in a way that doesn’t ensure that they end up with egg on their face, and thus blinded, shoot themselves in the feet.


Related Posts:

10 Comments »

Comments may be subject to moderation and/or approval before appearing. There is no need to post the same comment twice. The site moderator may remove any comment he or she deems inappropriate, without notice.

Comment by Deas

June 27, 2007 @ 1:55 pm

I sure hope Japan figures international PR out. I know that they say 「水に流す」 and all, but seriously, it creates a flawed relationship in the international arena when only one party decides to do so. Especially since Japan forgives itself faster than those against whom it holds political grudges. Textbook content, war history, border disputes, the blame game for damages, etc. The list goes on - and international PR plays a large role in closing most of these issues.

Comment by DeOrio

June 27, 2007 @ 2:33 pm

I firmly agree with that, Deas. I’m just not sure that Japan has forgiven itself. I think facing the issues comes before any kind of self-forgiveness and that has yet to happen. I think the government is just trying to put wartime issues behind it and forget without examination or forgiveness.

Ken, as we’ve said many times, the government of Japan simply does not understand that there is no such thing as a division between comments for domestic consumption and comments for international consumption. Those in the Japan-really-didn’t-do-anything-bad camp seem to have convinced themselves of their own specious arguments. It’s not surprising, the issues change from country to country, but this is same thing hardcore conservatives in the US did to convince themselves that the US did nothing wrong during the Cold War and that Bill Clinton was the worst kind of criminal.

Robert Dujarric was right that Japan needs a corps of America experts in Washington. In this case, they could have told the LDP that no one outside of Japan even considers the denial arguments arguments. They come off as ridiculous tripe and it’s a shame people high up in Japan have yet to figure that out.

Comment by DeOrio

June 28, 2007 @ 9:16 am

Shiozaki said this would have no direct bearing on US-Japan relations, so Japan wasn’t going to react or comment. Smart, but not so smart considering Ryozo Kato, Japan’s Ambassador to the US said the resolution woul damage US-Japan relations.

What I’m wondering now is whether the government has finally learned a little bit about PR or whether communication and discipline within the government is really that bad. Almost as disturbing as the imprudent comments that so often come from the kantei or various ministers is the disparity among statements by high-ranking government officials. Abe might not ever let go of the wheel of the ship in a storm, but he certainly doesn’t run a tight ship and he certainly hasn’t proven a very capable navigator.

Comment by Elle J

June 28, 2007 @ 12:10 pm

Nuckin futs. What right does the US government have to tell Japan what to do? Like the US doesn’t have it’s own skeletons in their closet. This is just more imperealist bullshit. Japan should make a law condeming the US for Iraq. But no. The US would use it’s continuing occupation of Japan to excert pressure on them. Bullshit.

Ken, how is it pouring gasoline on a fire to stand up for themselves?

Comment by DeOrio

June 28, 2007 @ 1:35 pm

Oh, Elle J, good try. You have the rage, just not the information, reading comprehension, or spelling. This might be a little more your speed. 頑張って!

Comment by DeOrio

June 28, 2007 @ 1:37 pm

You could also start here.

Comment by Ken Worsley

June 28, 2007 @ 2:21 pm

Elle,

You seem to have missed my point entirely. Did I say the US should be telling Japan what to do?

how is it pouring gasoline on a fire to stand up for themselves?

Certain actions - those mentioned in the post - led to the passage of the referrendum in the Committee. Japan’s lack of PR skills in the international arena is to blame. I was bemoaning this lack of skills.

Comment by John S

June 29, 2007 @ 12:13 am

Japan should make a law condeming the US for Iraq.

You might have missed the fact that Japan has been involved in the Iraq conflict as well from the beginning.

But maybe you’re on to something, Elle: Maybe Japan should start passing resolutions against itself. At least, that’s what you seem to be arguing for.

Also, do you know what a ‘law’ is? What’s moving through the US House of Reps is a resolution.

Comment by ken

June 29, 2007 @ 1:37 am

Good point, John. I don’t get the idea that pointing out the gross errors that Japan has made in regards to this case somehow means that one is supporting the other side. Typical knee-jerk lack of logic, I guess.

Comment by ken

July 4, 2007 @ 5:13 pm

Chris, thanks for your comment. I had only seen the issue from Debito’s site. Have you tried getting the story to any reporters at major media sources?

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>