Defense Minister Kyuma is Gone: Shouganai

Filed under: Japan in the News, Politics
Posted by Ken Worsley at 12:38 am on Thursday, July 5, 2007

Note: This piece is a something of a precursor to a longer editorial by TPR’s Garrett DeOrio that is due to be published soon. We will be in certain disagreement.

Inevitable.

That’s the word the English-language media used to translate former Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma’s remarks surrounding the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Inevitable.

In Japanese, the word he used was shouganai. The use of this word has spurred quite a bit of commentary in the Japanese press. The Asahi Shimbun has attempted to bridge the language gap with an article entitled, “Kyuma should know bombs aren’t inevitable,” which offers the explanation that shouganai “usually applies to extraordinary natural phenomena.”

Although I beg to differ with the Asahi’s interpretation (one of my former bosses used to use the phrase shouganai when referring to things that were clearly not “extraordinary natural phenomena,” such as the time when the company went bankrupt and he lost his job), that is neither here nor there. The point is that this word is highly inappropriate to use in such a situation, although I feel the Asahi’s moral grandstanding goes a bit too far (reading the Asahi piece and Mr DeOrio’s soon-to-be-published article here will show our one point of agreement).

At a question and answer session Wednesday afternoon, Kyuma told reporters, 「九州弁でしょうがないというのが口癖で、すぐに出るんですよ」, or, “In the Kyushu dialect, shoganai is a favorite expression, and it rolls right off the tongue.”

Sir, you are a politician. It’s one thing to speak your mind (which you have done recklessly in the past), but another to cause hardship for your boss this close to an election and after having already been told to watch what you say in public.

I have called for his resignation twice here at TPR, once after his misguided statements that the Japanese government did not officially support the war in Iraq (a war in which Japan has had soldiers on the ground), and a second time after Kyuma claimed the US invaded Iraq on the premise that Iraq had nuclear weapons (certainly, the US used every other false pretense in the book, but not this one).

Whether what he said was right or wrong does not matter. It means nothing. I might agree with him to some extent, but the point is that this is a political issue. As a politician and a party member, he bears a responsibility to not cause trouble, again and again. The timing (just before an election), the nuance (shouganai) and the fact that his boss had already told him to be careful with public comments makes his comments inexcusable. Not to mention, it highlights the Prime Minister’s incompetence at keeping his Cabinet in line.

I believe Abe should have had the guts to fire him, instead of letting him step down.

However, until the resignation of Donald Rumsfeld, it was difficult to maintain that Kyuma was the world’s worst defense chief. When Rumsfeld stepped down, Kyuma backed into the spot, not really having earned it, but nonetheless cemented in place. I figured it was a matter of time until he said something like, “The US let us attack Pearl Harbor,” or, “We should move on China next week,” or, “It’s was inevitable that the US dropped atomic bombs on us.” Kyuma was a verbal time bomb just waiting for the wrong press conference.

I’m going to cut this short here, for two reasons: 1) This should be developed into a longer piece, and 2) This was meant to be about the incoming Defense Secretary, Yuriko Koike.

The media has already put Koike in a different light, with Reuters publishing, “Japan’s first woman defence head has wardrobe woes,” yesterday.

Check out this photo. What the hell is she wearing?

Garrett, it’s all yours.


Related Posts:

3 Comments »

Comments may be subject to moderation and/or approval before appearing. There is no need to post the same comment twice. The site moderator may remove any comment he or she deems inappropriate, without notice.

Comment by DeOrio

July 5, 2007 @ 10:16 am

On Kyuma, my views will be a little bit clearer later when my editorial is published. As a teaser, though, Kyuma was hounded from office not for the myriad legitimate reasons there were for driving his dumbass away from any position of responsibility, but for one of the most responsible public statements he ever made. There’s a lot more I want to say right now, but it’s already been written and recorded in my forthcoming piece, so I’ll let it lie for the moment.

One thing I didn’t address in the piece and which I will address here is the nature and motivation behind Kyuma’s often stupid remarks.

I really think his heart was in the right place. Unlike Koike, he wanted peace and didn’t believe in any kind of nationalistic rhetoric. He didn’t bill himself as a reformer with his brown nose still up Abe’s. . . mmhmm.

It might have been only a matter of time before Kyuma used shouganai in connection with the A-bomb and it was certainly only a matter of time before he said something in public that would make me wonder whether he was the only functionally illiterate adult in Japan, but it was by no means a matter of time until Kyuma said something stupid in a nationalistic line, such as “We should move on China next week.”

Koike is smarter and better qualified for the job, but we are losing a little something with Kyuma: his thorniness. Kyuma was not really one of Abe’s boys. Kyuma acted as a drag on the Defense Ministry, not only because of incompetence, but also because he was genuinely concerned with peace. I think his backtracking and explaining earlier this week were unfortunate because he implied something important in his original statement.

To call an A-bomb attack unavoidable, inevitable, not to be helped, or however else you want to translate shouganai implies that events had reached a point where nothing better could happen. This implies that things were pretty bad, which they were, and pokes a hole in this bullshit notion of Japanese victimhood.

How did things get to that point?

Koike is a smart woman, but her heart is not in the right place at all. She’s a party hack. Her first statement, calling the A-bombing “unacceptable from a humanitarian viewpoint” and “an outright challenge to human beings” was both vapid and gutless.

Of course A-bombing is bad. Who the hell has said it’s not? It takes no stones to say so.

She also went on to say, “We will continue to firmly maintain the relationship with the U.S. under the Japan-U.S. security treaty.”

Doesn’t that require just a little bit of explanation? If you’re going to call an action an outright challenge to human beings and accept the mantle of a segment of the body politic that has sidestepped the nuclear issue by saying US actions were inconsistent with international law (while also, incidentally, saying that the Tokyo Tribunal was invalid because there was no relevant law at the time to which Japan was a party), then pledge to work closely and seek closer ties with the very nation that violated international law and issued this outright challenge to humanity, you have some serious explaining to do.

One press conference and Koike has already shown us she is not about to take any chances or put her intelligence to use.

As for her clothes: who the fuck cares what the new Defense Minister of Japan is wearing? Sometimes I have some serious doubts about the British press.

Comment by ken

July 5, 2007 @ 10:25 am

I don’t mean he would have literally said that about China, it’s just meant to be an example of some of the dumber possible things he (or anyone in that job) could have said.

I’m not sure how Koike is better qualified for the job, though. Call me old fashioned, but I like to see someone with some stars on their shoulders in any defense chief position.

Comment by DeOrio

July 5, 2007 @ 12:12 pm

Stars aren’t a bad thing - helpful if you’re dealing with current military brass, but, at a time when the Defense Ministry is nascent, the rules are changing, and the move seems to be toward a more active role for the military, I think it’s imperative that every possible step be taken to make it clear to all involved that civilian control of the millitary is one thing that will not change.
At the moment, Japan needs a Defense Minister with foreign policy cred as much as military cred.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>