Building a Beautiful Japan: The Survey Results

Filed under: Japan in the News
Posted by Ken Worsley at 1:32 am on Sunday, July 8, 2007

On July 5, the Cabinet Office published the results of its survey into public attitudes concerning Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s idea of “A Beautiful Country, Japan.” It seems unlikely that an English translation will be offered by the Cabinet Office (and certainly not any time soon), so I think it’s worth looking into what the survey asked and what it found.

We reported on the government’s desire to carry out such a survey back in January, when it was reported that the Cabinet Office would create a list of ‘100 quintessential elements of Japan’ by polling the public on what makes Japan beautiful. Of course, the poll published on Thursday was done in multiple-choice format, so the set of possible answers has been pretty much dictated by the government.

The survey was sent to 3,000 Japanese citizens over the age of 20, and 1,827, or 60.9 percent, replied. It was carried out from May 24 to June 3 of this year. There were six main questions that were asked, and I’d like to give a translation of the first two, since they seem most indicative of how the public feels about the current state of Japan:

1. Do you think that Japan is currently beautiful?

It is beautiful 10.6%
If I had to decide, I would say it’s beautiful 42.7%
If I had to decide, I would say it’s not beautiful 31.8%
It is not beautiful 11.2%
Cannot decide between the two 3.1%
I don’t know 0.7%

2. What is beautiful about Japan?

  1. Nature (Mountains, forests, the sea, the four seasons and so on) 80%
  2. Japanese craftsmanship (Traditional industrial arts, temple carpentry, small factories and workshops) 58.5%
  3. Scenery (the countryside, undeveloped woodland landscapes, towns with tiles roofs) 52.8%
  4. Traditional culture (Noh, Kabuki, Japanese dancing, festivals, Sumo) 50.8%
  5. Japanese spirit, disposition and sense (Modest virtues, manners and etiquette, diligence) 33.8%
  6. Japanese food culture (Sushi, Shoujin Ryori - vegetarian cuisine derived from Buddhist dietary rules) 33.7%
  7. Japanese patterns of behavior (Rigidness/Regularity/Coldness in movements and behavior, a Japanese lifestyle with tatami and fusuma - sliding screens) 33.7%
  8. Japanese language (Keigo, dialects, ancient Japanese words) 32.8%
  9. Leading edge technology (Energy conservation implementing technologies, mobile phone technologies) 17.2%
  10. Youth culture (Pop culture, fashion, J-pop) 4.7%
  11. Other 0.2%
  12. Nothing Special 0.7%
  13. I don’t know 0.4%

Are there conclusions to be drawn from this? For one, I’d like to know why the Cabinet Office felt it necessary to conduct the survey in multiple choice format, with the possible answers already laid out. Some critics of Japan have made the case that the government, especially through bodies such as the Ministry of Education, have actively sought to define what being Japanese means instead of allowing such concepts to develop naturally. I’ve always found such arguments to be bordering on conspiracy theory, but there is something behind such lines of thought.

I think we also need to bear in mind that this survey represents the views of about 0.000014% of Japan’s population (I’m using 127,000,000 as the population of Japan). These numbers hardly seem relevant. The report does not tell us how the 3,000 people who received surveys were selected, how the survey was carried out, or what the age breakdown was for respondents. Answers to these questions would be highly relevant.

Later in the survey, we learn that 21.8% of respondents felt that Japan’s beauty should be communicated overseas, while 29.1% felt that it was important to participate in Japan’s beauty through attendance at festivals and other such cultural events. 29.2% believed that it was important to have writings published or seminars held in order to teach people about what is beautiful about Japan. Those results also seem telling.

I don’t know if the attitude is that “Foreigners won’t understand Japan,” or, “Foreigners aren’t interested in Japan anyway,” or, “Japan is too esoteric to be explained overseas,” but it seems that a surprisingly low number of people seem interested in communicating what is unique about Japan to people from overseas.

Any other ideas?


Related Posts:

8 Comments »

Comments may be subject to moderation and/or approval before appearing. There is no need to post the same comment twice. The site moderator may remove any comment he or she deems inappropriate, without notice.

Comment by John S

July 8, 2007 @ 3:38 am

Why is food culture so low? Japan absolutely rules in terms of food. I’ve never lived anywhere with such diversity of food and regional specialties and local chefs so highly trained in carrying on food tradition. I agree that TV goes overboard - I once saw B-list celebrities eating pancakes on TV - but overall, no other country compares in terms of selection, adoptation and quality of professional chefs at traditional recipies.

Comment by Shawn

July 8, 2007 @ 8:54 am

What a pointless survey. Here’s my cynical take: Abe has already published his version of a beautiful country. In publishing a survey with pre-defined answers, it’s is a vain attempt to see if the public agrees with Abe.

Even though the sample is very small, if the responses favor Abe’s view he can use the survey to foist his cockamamie vision of Japan on the public.

Comment by WG

July 8, 2007 @ 4:10 pm

I think Shawn’s on to something, and it reveals a bit into the thinking process of this administration. Abe can come out and say this is what the public thinks or wants without actually, honestly asking them. I don’t think anyone buys it, and the only danger is if he stays in office long enough to do anything.

Comment by DeOrio

July 8, 2007 @ 10:07 pm

Couldn’t agree more, guys. Any survey, no matter how large, that counts only those who choose to respond and that offers only pre-selected answers, with no weight given to the negative, is unscientific and useless at best.

Comment by Ken Y-N

July 10, 2007 @ 4:03 pm

I think we also need to bear in mind that this survey represents the views of about 0.0000014% of Japan’s population (I’m using 127,000,000 as the population of Japan). These numbers hardly seem relevant.

They are relevant, as the Cabinet Office surveys always use random sampling from the electoral rolls, they conduct face-to-face interviews, and they usually (not this time, however!) report on why people don’t respond. It is possible with even just 384 respondents to have a 95% confidence that your results are within 5% of the true figures, and given the sample size in this survey, the confidence interval is 2.3%.

http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm

(I also think the percentage is a factor of 10 too small)

Comment by ken

July 10, 2007 @ 4:16 pm

I don’t buy it, Ken…not for a second. Common sense tells me the sample size is way too small to be indicative of what the general public actually thinks, and that the setting up of multiple choice, pre-arranged ‘answers’ is misleading at best, but more likely to be a pure lie.

I’m not sure about that Survey System website either. They sure look like good sales people for their services! I don’t see any mathematicians on their website.

Point is, it’s impossible (and naive) to trust governments with projects such as these, where the goal is to rig the results to look like their agenda is supported (sounds a bit familiar, right?)

Yes, the percentage should be 0.000014%

Comment by DeOrio

July 10, 2007 @ 5:19 pm

The sample size is fine - 1,200 is considered by pollsters to be the ideal balance between accuracy and cost, provided the sample is random. The government sent out 3,000 questionnaires and got 1,827 back. That right there is the problem. If the government counts only those voluntarily sent back, the sample is no longer random because the respondents are self-selecting. The survey is not even an accurate measure of which of the pre-selected answers people like best. It is a pep rally, not a survey.

Had the government randomly sent out 1,827 questionnaires and gotten back 1,827 back, there would be no problem on that end and we could expect a margin of error of under 4%.

If the selection of participants is randomized well, the increased accuracy of going over a couple thousand respondents diminishes so quickly as to be not very well worth it.

1,827 is not the problem. 1,173 is the problem.

Pingback by Building a Beautiful Japan: The Survey Results : Japan Economy News & Blog

December 2, 2007 @ 10:51 pm

[…] I’ve added a file to the “Research and Reports on Japan” section. This is the results of the Cabinet Office’s survey into what it means to build a “Beautiful Japan.” The report is in Japanese, although I have published a partial translation at Trans-Pacific Radio. If anyone is interested in obtaining a full translation (since I don’t think the Cabinet Office will do so, and it is bound to be useful for marketers), please get in touch. […]

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>