DPJ: 60, LDP: 37 - Abe Tunnels Under the Hashimoto Line after Upper House Election

Filed under: Japan in the News, Politics
Posted by Garrett DeOrio at 9:33 am on Monday, July 30, 2007

Alberto Fujimori lost. That I saw coming. As for other election results, I’m pleased to be eating crow this morning. The Democratic Party of Japan and other opposition parties combined to win 75 seats in yesterday’s House of Councillors election. The ruling Liberal Democratic Party got 37 seats and its coalition partner, the New Komeito, a mere nine.

The totals in the Upper House are now 137 for the opposition and 105 for the ruling coalition, which still has the Lower House.

Despite the absolute trouncing his ruling coalition took, Abe kept the support of top LDP officials and vowed to stay on as Prime Minister to bravely push for reforms the people seem not to want.

This seems to be a trend among some world leaders of late. Perhaps wanting to appear courageous or resolute, they refuse to back down in the face of opposition, which would be admirable but for the fact that these guys are supposed to be leading democracies and the opposition is coming from their own people.

At the moment, there’s not a whole lot the LDP can do. It, along with its partner, the New Komeito, still controls the more powerful House of Representatives, but will obviously have a somewhat tougher time pushing through big reforms without the House of Councillors in its hands.

There was speculation prior to the election that something drastic might happen should the LDP fail to clear the “Hashimoto line” - 44 seats, the number that the LDP won when former Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto was pushed out.

Abe, though, has a little bit of time due to the lack of options for his party. The Prime Minister has no clear successor and the party lacks a shining star who could set things right. While some people have laid out plausible scenarios in which a snap election could be called, I think its unlikely, as the LDP would likely lose and they must know that.

Keep watching, though - I’ve been wrong before.

Now that the DPJ has a bit of power, the onus is on them to do something with it. The party seems to lack a coherent platform or ideology and did well probably simply because it was no the LDP. This amorphousness could become a liability if the DPJ is seen to have frittered away its Upper House strength by the time the next general election rolls around.

2007 Upper House Election by the Numbers

Going into the election, the ruling coalition of the LDP and New Komeito held 58 seats, while the opposition parties combined held 63. With 122 seats needed for a majority, the ruling coalition thus needed to secure 64 seats in order to be assured of an outright majority. As stated above, that did not happen, as the LDP/New Komeito managed only 46 seats together. Here is the breakdown of seats won by party:

Liberal Democratic Party: 37
New Komeito: 9
Democratic Party of Japan: 60
Japan Communist Party: 3
Social Democratic Party: 2
People’s New Party: 2
New Party Nippon: 1
Others/Independent: 8

2007 Upper House Election Results
Party Number of Winning Candidates Total Seats
Total Elected
on July 29
Electoral Districts Proportional
Representation
Liberal Democratic Party 37 23 14 83
New Komeito 9 2 7 20
Others 1 1 0 2
Democratic Party of Japan 60 40 20 109
Japanese Communist Party 3 0 3 7
Social Democratic Party 2 0 2 5
People’s New Party 2 1 1 4
New Party Nippon 1 0 1 1
Others 6 6 0 11
Vacancies 0 0 0 0
Total 121 73 48 242

Related Posts:

10 Comments »

Comments may be subject to moderation and/or approval before appearing. There is no need to post the same comment twice. The site moderator may remove any comment he or she deems inappropriate, without notice.

Comment by ken

July 30, 2007 @ 11:19 pm

It seems like Mike Honda has done the LDP a huge favor by giving them a giant distraction issue, as the US House will vote tomorrow on the ‘comfort women’ resolution. Let’s see if the LDP is politically savvy enough to use this distraction to their benefit. Somehow I doubt it.

Comment by Pius

July 31, 2007 @ 12:22 am

“Reforms they don’t seem to want,” you say, but isn’t the problem really that people actually are in favor of the policies?

“Abe lost because of the scandals, not because of policy”
(scroll down a bit for the comment made by a 30something housewife)

Comment by Matt Dioguardi

July 31, 2007 @ 6:02 am

Speaking of the comfort resolution … it’s been passed!

Check out the Washington post … or see my blog for the link.

Kyodo has also posted something.

Comment by DeOrio

July 31, 2007 @ 9:33 am

Pius, the link seems to have expired.

Back in May, an Asahi poll showed a small majority in favor of some kind of constitutional reform, but over 80% of those wanting administrative or spending reforms, not reform of Article 9, which drew considerably less support. Majorities in other polls have said they did not support Abe’s “Beautiful Country, Japan” platform.

I would wholeheartedly agree, that Abe’s main problem seems to be inaction, or at least the perception of a feeble kind of lethargy. He doesn’t do much and then vows to start working for things people don’t want.

A huge majority of respondents to pre-election poll said they wanted drastic change in the government, which would show that it is not Abe or his plans that they want.

Comment by Alex

July 31, 2007 @ 10:07 pm

I’m not sure its Abe’s inaction that soured him with the electorate. It’s that he was perceived as someone who couldn’t stand up to internal and external pressure and therefore was someone who could not lead his party and the country.

North Korea though still a major issue isn’t as pressing as internal conflicts at the moment. That’s a problem for Abe because even in his first speech in the diet, his national policies were a bit vague except his stand on the DPRK and the hostage situation. He was pretty spot on with that.

The issue here, at least in my mind, is that Abe is faced with growing resentment because he is perceived as not being someone who can control his own party members. I think his loyalty is very admirable, but to save himself he is either going to learn to have to make the tough decisions and remove people that are not fit or that make the mistakes as we’ve seen.
If he doesn’t, he’s going to be out of a job. I think its basically that simple for him.

The LDP hinges on his actions. And I’m sure Ozawa and company are hoping Abe stays on.

Interesting how George Bush and Shinzo Abe both are loyal to a fault in these circumstances.

Comment by Julián Ortega Martínez

August 1, 2007 @ 5:51 am

It’s pretty obvious Abe is staying on just because there’s no one to replace him. Of course he should step down, but the question now is when is he -finally- going to do that.

As for the DPJ, I agree with the FT when it says: “Mr Abe and the LDP deserved to lose this weekend’s upper house election. The problem for Japan is that Mr Ozawa and the DPJ did not deserve to win”. Anyway, as we say here, “something” is better than “nothing”.

If Ozawa manages to make enough pressure to force a lower house dissolution and a snap election, how soon can this be? Will the LDP allow it? And, though this is not that important, will the JCP join the future DPJ-led ruling coalition, despite criticizing it because of its “ambiguity” referring issues as constitutional reform?

Comment by ken

August 1, 2007 @ 2:05 pm

Alex:

You’re certainly right about North Korea. That issue brought Mr Abe to power, and it did not register anywhere in what the voters were worried about going into this election.

In a sense, I see that as the difference between Abe and Bush. Bush has Karl Rove, who would have insured that something like the abduction issue would flare up in the days leading to the election, that scandals related to DPJ lawmakers would have been all over the news, and that the DPJ would have been blamed for the pension fiasco.

The LDP tried the last one I mentioned, but failed. They just showed no political skill, and Abe has proven time and time again that he is just a coddled amateur surrounded by a barely-competent team.

Comment by ken

August 2, 2007 @ 12:06 am

DeOrio,

The link wasn’t expired, it just had a <br /> tag stuck to the end, which messed it up. It’s here:

http://www.japannewsreview.com/politics/politics/20070730page_id=1186

Comment by DeOrio

August 2, 2007 @ 9:43 am

Interesting. Thanks, Ken.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>