Whaling, Gas Tax, Gyoza, and Executions: TPR News for Sunday, February 3, 2008

Filed under: Trans-Pacific Radio, TPR News
Posted by Garrett DeOrio at 11:28 pm on Sunday, February 3, 2008

In this edition of TPR News: Australia heightens the rhetoric against Japanese whaling; Fukuda’s advisory panel backs off on barring politicians from consorting with bureaucrats; the gas tax debate heats up; Osaka has Japan’s youngest governor; car sales are up; incomes are down; poisoned gyoza! Posioned gyoza!; and Japan hangs three.

TPR is proud to support the Black Stripe Theater’s presentation of David Mamet’s Glengarry Glen Ross, February 22nd to 24th at Theatre Iwato.

Politics

In the Japanese press, throwing a stink bomb and boarding a ship makes one a terrorist. In the Australian press, being detained after making non-lethal attacks on a ship and illegally boarding it, makes that same person a hostage.

While both Japan and Australia say the issue will not harm their otherwise cordial relationship, the acrimony surrounding Japan’s whaling in the Southern Ocean, near Antarctica, continued to rise as Australian Foreign Minister Stephen Smith made his first visit to Japan since the government of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd took power. Australia has said it would dispatch a Customs vessel to the Southern Ocean to monitor the hunt, which Australia vociferously opposes, and Japan, in response to increased pressure from environmental groups, has decided to have its Coast Guard protect its whaling fleet.

Smith said Australia was considering international legal action against Japan to halt its Antarctic whaling.

As part of the largest assistance package to Iraq after that of the United States, the Japan Bank of International Cooperation will provide the Iraqi government with 182.7 billion yen in loans, part of the 537 billion yen Japan pledged to Iraq in 2003. The loans will fund eight civil engineering and infrastructure projects.

In domestic politics, an advisory panel to Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda backed off from its planned recommendation that bureaucrats be forbidden to contact Diet members and instead proposed that such contact be regulated and that the government revamp the bureaucracy “within five years.”

Collusion and influence peddling are seen to be widespread problems in the government and close contact between bureaucrats and sitting Diet members was called the “root of all evil” by some panel members. However, Diet members in the ruling coalition, rather obviously, vigorously opposed such a ban and, instead, got a watered-down set of rules governing under what circumstances bureaucrats and politicians could meet.

The panel also proposed a restructuring of the current two-track employment system in the bureaucracy, which has career and non-career tracks, to classify bureaucrats as comprehensive, specialist, or general employees under a Cabinet personnel agency, which would integrate the management of the bureaucracy. The Cabinet personnel agency would be created by a bill to be proposed in the 2009 Diet session. The new three track system is designed to promote flexibility in hiring, transfers among agencies, and promotions. While it appears that the new comprehensive track would be similar to the current career track, there would be limits placed on the number of people from each track who could be promoted to certain managerial positions.

A “state strategy staff” that would bring in outside experts as well as bureaucrats to assist the Cabinet was also proposed.

The ordinary Diet session’s hot debate, that over a bill to extend a temporary gasoline tax, continues to approach the boiling point. The gas tax was originally put in place over thirty years ago and is used to provide extra revenue for road projects. The LDP-led ruling coalition wants to keep the higher rates, the DPJ-led opposition camp wants to let them expire, as shceduled, on March 31st. On Tuesday, shortly after passing a supplementary budget bill, the ruling coalition submitted a stopgap bill to the House of Representatives, in which it has a supermajority, to temporarily extend the gas tax for two months, to May 31st. Earlier in the day, prior to the stopgap bill’s submission, some members of the DPJ had vowed to engage in “physical resistance” were the bill submitted.

While there were a few good scenes of outraged lawmakers raising their voices in the Diet to call the ruling coalition undemocratic, members of the opposition snatching papers away from ruling coalition members, and a bit of chaos as lawmakers entered and exited the chamber, compromise won the day. Lower House Speaker Yohei Kono, of the LDP, and Upper House President Satsuki Eda, of the DPJ, met and agreed to accelerate discussion on the budget and other financial proposals with an eye to reaching decisions on them before the end of the fiscal year on March 31st, which is what Prime Minister Fukuda had asked for lest the opposition should see the ruling camp use its supermajority to force a bill through the Diet for the second time in 2008. In exchange for an agreement to discuss the gas tax, the opposition saw the stopgap bill pulled.

The compromise was only the third time in pastwar Japan that the heads of both houses of the Diet had mediated a dispute between political parties in the Diet.

The ruling camp was worried that the expiration of the tax prior to the passage of a new tax would result in “confusion” as the tax would effectively be repealed, then reinstated a few months later - a situation that wouldn’t look good for them.

On Monday, LDP-backed lawyer and TV star Toru Hashimoto defeated DPJ-backed engineering professor Sadatoshi Kumagai in the first head-to-head gubernatorial race between the main ruling and opposition parties in Osaka since 1975. Hashimoto’s win made him the youngest-ever governor in Japan, at 38, unseating the previous record-holder, 40-year-old Masanao Ozaki of Kouchi, who was elected last month. Hashimoto voiwed fiscal austerity, saying he would not allow the issuance of prefectural bonds and would force the prefecture to make do with what it had. As Osaka carries a heavy debt burden and issues over 200 billion yen worth of bonds annually and refinanced 350 billion yen in bonds over the four years up to 2007 to delay repayment, such belt-tightening would be no small matter.

Hashimoto has said he would make up for the shortfall by reducing personnel costs, which already has public employees worried, as that means salary cuts, and has supervisors, who already have a difficult time recruiting good prospects, worried that they simply won’t be able to attract the people they need.

Hashimoto, though, has also proposed plans to beautify schools and provide hot lunches, which will be difficult for the prefectural governor as public schools are usually administered by municipalities.

The young governor, though, has one characteristic important to politicians: the ability to turn a phrase. Among his gems is the opining that Japanese men who hire Chinese prostitutes are “providing a kind of Overseas Development Assistance (ODA) to China.”

And here’s the editorial bit:
So, that puts two of the country’s three largest cities in the hands of celebrities that are complete assholes - don’t forget about Tokyo’s Shintaro Ishihara. And while he doesn’t preside over a megalopolis, let us not forget serviced-by-minors Governor Hideo Higashikokubaru of Miyazaki. Higashikokubaru’s famous enough that his election and image provided an Higashikokubaru-centered economic boomlet. Ishihara, despite his racism, xenophobia, sexism, agism, chauvinism, and general lack of understanding of the world around him has had a few good ideas. Ideas that are now unfortunately overshadowed by his insistence on trying to procure the 2016 Olympics for Tokyo, which is a bad idea. Hashimoto has compared Osaka to a bankrupt company, an analogy that works to an extent. The problem is that a prefectural government is not a company. Osaka has been able to amass debts no company could have amassed and has responsibilities and duties it has to discharge regardless of financial status. Furthermore, a company in as much debt as Osaka would not be well advised to hire a lawyer whose main qualification is having been a talking head on TV to run the show. Call me a skeptic, but I wouldn’t bet on Hashimoto being able to fulfill many of his pledges. Planting grass in schoolyards is a great, achievable idea, though. Kids in the second-richest nation on Earth shouldn’t have to play in dirt and concrete.

Business and the Economy

Household spending was up 2.2% in December, according to the Statistics Bureau. Spending in the “Culture and Recreation” and “Housing” categories led the rise, while spending on “Clothing and Footwear” and “Medical Care” showed declines in February.

While spending rose, average household incomes fell by 2.7% in December. Disposable income was reported at down 3.6% from a year ago. For a full writeup on both household spending and incomes in December, please visit Japan Economy News.

Also in December, Japan’s unemployment rate stayed fixed at 3.8%, despite many forecasters having predicted a rise. While the number of jobs in construction and manufacturing continues to fall, the wholesale and retail sector as well as the medical and welfare service sector posted large gains in the number of new hires.

For the full year of 2007, Japan’s unemployment rate averaged 3.9%, which is the lowest figure seen since 1997, when Japan’s unemployment stood at 3.4%. Despite this good news, the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare is reporting that the number of jobs available per applicant has been declining over the past two months.

According to data released by video game industry watcher Enterbrain, Nintendo’s Wii gaming console has opened a wide lead in sales over rival Sony’s PlayStation 3 platform. After the PlayStation 3 outsold the Wii in November, Nintendo has hit back with a vengeance, releasing new software and hardware that has provided a strong boost in sales. Since hitting the shelves ten weeks ago, Nintendo’s “Wii Fit” exercise hardware has sold over 1.2 million units. Enterbrain reported that in the four weeks ending January 27, Nintendo moved 479,931 units of the Wii versus Sony’s 165,719 PlayStation 3 shipments.

In 2007, sales of passenger cars, trucks and buses in Japan fell by 7.6%, showing a decline for the fourth consecutive year and reaching their lowest point since 1972. The Toyota Corolla was the nation’s best selling passenger model for the fifth consecutive year, though in December and January it was outsold by Honda’s Fit. When minicars were included in the statistics, Suzuki’s Wagon R was Japan’s best selling vehicle last year, with 226,725 units sold.

In 2007, the Corolla was followed by Toyota’s Vitz, Honda’s Fit, Toyota’s Passo and Nissan’s Serena in terms of sales.

In January, however, new auto sales increased by 3.7%. Sales of passenger cars and buses increased, while truck sales were down 14.5%. Sales of minicars fell for the 10th straight month in January.

Society

On Wednesday, reports of at least ten people having fallen ill from eating “poisoned” gyoza hit the mainstream news shows. The people ate an an organophosphate called methamidophos, legal as a pesticide in China, but not approved in Japan. The investigation and furor surrounds a family in Chiba’s Inage Ward who fell ill on January 22nd after eating gyoza made by Tianyang Food of Shijiazhuang, Hebei province, imported by JT Foods, a subsidiary of Japan Tobacco, and sold at Co-op supermarkets. Concentrations of the chemical in question are as high as 400 times the level permissible by Japanese standards, leading investigators to believe that the pesticide was not left over from inadequate processing and cleaning, but was placed there intentionally. Furthering this belief was a three-millimeter
hole found in one package of the products in question eaten by a Hyogo that fell ill on January 5th - at least three weeks before a recall of possibly dangerous products began and the public was notified. Co-op began pulling the tainted products from the shelves a day before the news broke.

By Friday, at least 1,088 people in 38 prefectures had reported falling ill due to eating contaminated gyoza and other processed food products made by Tianyang Food, whose products have been pulled from the shelves of supermarkets across Japan.

Just to thicken the plot and drive home the point that it’s all about money, the Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission is looking into possible insider trading at Japan Tobacco prior to the company’s public announcement of a recall.

The Prime Minister, on Friday, asked all Ministers to do their utmost to deal with the problem of poisoned gyoza, which made for some unintentionally humorous newspaper headlines on Saturday morning.

For a rundown of what this TV darling of a scandal means, take a gander at MTC’s post on it on Shisaku.

Takashi Mochida, aged 65, in Tokyo, Masahiko Matsubara, 63, in Osaka, and Keishi Nago, 37, in Fukuoka were hanged on Friday, the second trio to be executed since Japan began disclosing the names of executed prisoners late last year, bringing the number of prisoners on death row to 104. The disclosure of names is part of a slow trend of releasing more information about executions. The Justice Ministry only began disclosing the number of prisoners executed on the days of their executions in 1998. Prior to that, only the total number of executions was released in an annual report.

Mochida had been convicted of the revenge killing of a woman he had raped and who had testified against him; Matsubara had been convicted of raping, strangling, and robbing two women; and Nago had been convicted of stabbing and killing his sister-in-law and niece and seriously wounding his nephew.

Justice Minister Kunio Hatoyama, a steadfast supporter of capital punishment, has been pushing to carry out death setences as soon as possible after review of the cases is complete. Despite Japan’s move towards greater transparency in captial cases, the country still draws strong criticism for not publicly setting execution dates and for only releasing information related to executions after the fact.

Said Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis, “This is apalling. There are no civilized ways to execute a human being, but there are varying degrees of inhumanity. The Japanese procedure is as inhumane as it gets.”

Japan’s heavy reliance on often coerced confessions, almost certain convictions in criminal cases that go to trial, and secretive interrogation and criminal investigation procedures also frequently draw criticism from other developed countries, human rights groups, and legal activists.

In defense of Japan’s system of capital punishment, Justice Minister Hatoyama had an enlightening quote in an interview with Weekly Asahi in October of last year:

As the Japanese place so much importance on the value of life, it is thought that one should pay with one’s own life for taking the life of another. You see, the Western nations are civilizations based on power and war. So, conversely, things are moving against the death penalty. This is an important point to understand. The so-called civilizations of power and war are the opposite of us. From incipient stages, their conception of the value of life is weaker than the Japanese. Therefore, they are moving toward abolition of the death penalty.

It is important that this discourse on civilizations be understood.

Listen Now:


icon for podpress  TPR News: 02/03/08: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Related Posts:

25 Comments »

Comments may be subject to moderation and/or approval before appearing. There is no need to post the same comment twice. The site moderator may remove any comment he or she deems inappropriate, without notice.

Pingback by Whaling, Gas Tax, Gyoza, and Executions: TPR News for Sunday, February 3, 2008 | kiiwii

February 4, 2008 @ 3:50 am

[…] Read the full story […]

Comment by Vimy

February 4, 2008 @ 1:16 pm

Maybe it’s me, but I found the whiny “poison gyoza, poison gyoza” in the introduction to be crude. Why trivialize this issue? I realize the media has freaked out over it, but you offer no examples of their over-reaction other than to point to what somebody wrote in another blog. A pretty poor effort on this story, guys.

Comment by Turner

February 4, 2008 @ 6:43 pm

How do politicians get away with such statements??

Comment by Garrett DeOrio

February 5, 2008 @ 10:23 am

Vimy, the issue has been trivialized far beyond anything I could do. My panicked “Poison gyoza! Poison gyoza!” in the intro was meant to reflect the breathless panic of the news coverage, but you’re right, I didn’t include anything about the news coverage at all. The Shisaku article wasn’t meant to back up any anti-media argument of mine, either, more to show some of the possible implications of the story. I didn’t figure there was much to be gained by my saying what MTC had already said. Furthermore, if I did any more editorializing than I already do, the news to opinion ratio would flop in the wrong direction. (Do you really want more of my opinion?)

I’ll lay it out here, though. The coverage of the issue has been absolutely insane and about as disproportionate as any coverage of any story in recent years. 1,088 (now more) claimed to be sick from eating gyoza. I will say, confidently, that most of those people probably have no kind of food poisoning at all and that few of those who are actually sick were poisoned with methamidophos. Every time there’s public health scare, many people jump on the bandwagon, so to speak.

It is terrible that people fell ill and it is even worse that at least one small child became seriously ill. It is also important that TV shows have informed people of the recall.

What is not admirable, though, is all the other public health threats, even more likely causes of food poisoning, that are unmentioned because they aren’t sexy enough stories for TV. I don’t buy the limited time argument as no TV news show has been short of time to show the same report over and over again. How many time have we seen the same Co-op “hitokuchi gyouza” package now? What does that accomplish other than to keep the hysteria up?

Last night, on NHK, we were treated to one of those large boards with pointless secret reveal panels tracing the route from factory to store - with no specifics at all, of course - showing us that, surprise! The poisoning probably happened in the factory.

Of course, this may very well be true, but we all know what any mainstream TV news show is going to tell us happened - China is dangerous.

The issue is huge because it’s a perfect storm for media. It has something dangerous that few people were actually exposed to, but many could have been; it has an easy visual - just show the package over and over again; and it plays into common fears - of indutrial food chains, of the unknown, and mostly of China.

MTC raised a very good point in his post: When you send production to China because there are fewer cumbersome and costly regulations, wages are far lower, and corners can be cut because people don’t want to pay the actual costs of the products they buy or the food they eat, you can’t expect things to be as regulated or as safe as if you did it domestically. You get what you pay for and sometimes you pay for corners you know are being cut and that you choose to ignore out of convenience.

Japan should, of course, do everything possible to ensure a safe food supply. Japanese companies that subcontract production to China should insist on certain standards. Just as important, though, consumers should pay attention to what they buy and eat, what they give to their children, and think once in a while about what it means to get so many products for such low prices.

At the end of the day, I see no exaggeration in calling wall-to-wall coverage of a few hundred cases of (in most cases) mild, brief poisoning excessive.

If the media are really worried about avoidable poisoning, let’s talk about mercury and dioxin, why don’t we? Not sexy enough. No clear potential to blame China.

Is taking a jab, however crude, at such panic really trivializing the issue?

Comment by Garrett DeOrio

February 5, 2008 @ 10:26 am

Turner, who’s going to hold politicians accountable for such statements? Shukanshi readers either know to take everything with a grain of salt or are so used to irrational, often completely false statements that comments such as Hatoyama’s would, unfortunately, probably make very few people bat an eye. On top of that, and even more unfortunately, there are probably a lot of people out there who either don’t realize how irrational he’s being or agree with him.

Comment by Igor

February 5, 2008 @ 11:48 am

“If the media are really worried about avoidable poisoning, let’s talk about mercury and dioxin, why don’t we? Not sexy enough. No clear potential to blame China.”

I agree with you. The media don’t say one basic thing: the first victims of food poisoning are Chinese people themselves. By the way, last here we had in Japan enough food scandals regarding Japanese companies: Mister Donuts, Fujiya, Meat Hope…

About Justice minister Hatoyama… no comment is necessary: he would be a good variety comedian, as well as Hashimoto, the new Osaka prefecture governor.

Comment by Vimy

February 5, 2008 @ 7:43 pm

Garrett, you’re explanation clears up everything. Thanks for that. I was expecting a straight forward accounting of the news but your “whine” at the beginning had me thinking it was a media criticism. There are of course, two stories here: what really happened and how the media reported it.

To answer your question is taking a jab at such panic really trivializing the issue, I have to say “yes” since it’s becoming clearer that the poisoning was deliberate and the police are now treating it as a criminal matter. That doesn’t let the media off the hook, because you’re right to point out that they are playing up the “China-bad-Japan-good” angle like there’s no tomorrow.

Comment by Garrett DeOrio

February 5, 2008 @ 10:49 pm

Igor, didn’t you hear? The tainted, spoiled, deliberately mislabeled food at Japanese companies was all the fault of elederly part-timers, subcontractors, or honest misunderstandings, which makes it OK. Now food made in China being poisoned is clearly a case of evil amongst us and we should all freak out.

Vimy, I expect you’re right, that it is a criminal matter. Then again, I obviously agree that the fact that its a crime that happened in a Chinese factory is a big part of what fuels the fire.

The more I think about it, the more I wonder why Japan would prohibit, or at least not approve a particular pesticide, but have no problem with importing vegetables coated in it. If this was deliberate poisoning, it probably doesn’t matter, but it seems like a massive loophole in the food safety plan. Why is a company majority-owned by the Japanese government not keeping production in Japan? Seems like that would be a lot more efficient than dumping huge subsidies on Japanese farms, but buying stuff from China. And given the fact that Japanese agricultural products are going to sell to health and safety-conscious or discriminating customers, why is Japanese agriculture still so chemical-dependent? Why not look into other methods if quality is the key? Could it be that the quality isn’t actually that much higher?
Actually, the more I think about it, the more it depresses me that this is one more for the in-denial-of-reality/no-real-lessons-will-be-learned column.

Comment by Turner

February 6, 2008 @ 2:08 pm

Efficient, yes, but I can definitely see where production in China would cut costs.

“Why not look into other methods if quality is the key? Could it be that the quality isn’t actually that much higher?”

Precisely. Japan is very much like America in this respect, in that the populace doesn’t really care (or if a scandal does occur, it falls in the no-real-lessons-will-be-learned category) as long as the market provides numerous cheap products.

Comment by Mark A

February 6, 2008 @ 6:57 pm

I have enjoyed listening to your podcasts. However,when listening to this latest edition of the news I was somewhat surprised to hear your choice of language to characterize the large city celebrity governors. Please note that I am not saying I was “shocked” as I am no prude and frankly I swear quite a bit more than most people but I know when to use bad language and when not to. Editorial or not, serious journalism does not resort to such crudities. I feel that you only damage your credibility as a commentator and cheapen your news show when you use such language. There are many options in the English language which could and, in the context of a serious news show, should, be used to express one’s complete disdain and lack of respect for an individual just as well or better than an expletive.

Comment by Garrett DeOrio

February 6, 2008 @ 11:53 pm

Last week, I had a few drinks with a regular listener who requested more straight news and fewer, or more clearly separated editorial comments or opinions, kind of like what we used to do when TPR News ended with a clearly separated “Last Word.” When I sat down to write the Politics and Society sections of this particular installment, I sat back and thought, “That’s pretty straightforward, now for a couple of touches.”

Unfortunately, the flourishes I added were to take a mocking tone the first time I mentioned the poisoned gyoza issue (in the intro) and to use a vulgarity in the one editorial comment in the podcast. Apparently, it’s the phrasing, not the amount of editorial comments that gets people’s attention and, in this particular edition of TPR News, I obviously crossed the line of good taste.

So, Mark A, Vimy, my apologies to both of you and to anyone else who was offended or put off by either of my indiscretions in this podcast (even to people who, unlike Mark, are prudes. Prudes’ opinions count, too.) I appreciate your listenership, am flattered to hear that we might even have a shot at being taken seriously, and hope you’ll be back (to comment as well as listen.)

I will admit, though, that part of me is thinking: if calling Hashimoto and Ishihara “complete assholes” isn’t the time to use vulgarity, there isn’t a time. Any other phrase, while in better taste, would have been less accurate. (But I will watch my mouth in the future.)

Comment by Garrett DeOrio

February 6, 2008 @ 11:55 pm

Turner, I agree. Sam Walton was certainly right: nothing really matters but price for most purchases.

Comment by Ken Worsley

February 7, 2008 @ 1:11 am

Garrett’s fired. I quit.

Comment by Ken Worsley

February 7, 2008 @ 1:11 am

No wait, I’m back.

Comment by Steve Schapiro

February 7, 2008 @ 1:59 am

Jesus, DeOrio apologized, then wrote a comment shorter than the original post. Pinch me.

Anyway, enough of this meta banter. The GOJ can’t be very happy about all this gyoza fuss - Japanese companies spent a lot of money setting up their China-dependent supply chains and Japan has no choice but to eat Chinese food. Not only can ordinary Japanese people not afford an all-Japanese diet, there’s just not enough Japanese food to go around. I’m not surprised the Japanese government isn’t flogging China over this. What I am surprised at is that a news cycle this long never, ever got beyond the headlines. Is the Japanese MSM really that worthless? CNN isn’t all that admirable, but at least we would have been stupefied by angles on the story. Not in Japan - same thing over and over again. I think I saw the same exact gyoza package 500 times.

As for Hashimoto, I’m going to bash the JMSM again. How could comment like that not follow him for the rest of his life, cutting off every opportunity in his reach? It should. Is such racism, sexism, insensitivity, and downright rudeness really that acceptable? Am I uptight for not finding that funny?

Comment by Ken Worsley

February 7, 2008 @ 10:55 pm

“Japan has no choice but to eat Chinese food”

An interesting statement. It’s certainly true now, and probably will be in the future, but there’s a chance that consumer behaviour could shift, and that could mean food manufacturers decide to set up shop elsewhere. China+1 risk management strategies are in place for a reason.

Comment by John s

February 7, 2008 @ 11:10 pm

Maybe there will be a ‘food gap’. People with money will be able to afford expensive, safe domestic food and others will have to roll the dice.

But that only works if the domestic food really is safe.

Comment by Garrett DeOrio

February 7, 2008 @ 11:21 pm

Very good point, John. Not many rich people eat frozen discount gyoza. Many more problems like this and there might be a shift in the countries that produce the imported food, but the mentality of wanting a lot for a little will still be with us and we’ll see the same kind of problems. No lessons will be learned.

Comment by Ken Worsley

February 7, 2008 @ 11:35 pm

“Not many rich people eat frozen discount gyoza.”

Never know about restaurants. We might start to see a boom in restaurants ‘adding value’ by selling 100% domestic dishes.

Comment by Garrett DeOrio

February 8, 2008 @ 1:41 am

You know, while I’m certainly not all about industrial food and I’ve been to China, traveled around, and seen how nasty it can be, I’ve also been to Japanese farms and we’re not talking models of health. If the risk at hand is the risk of abnormally high levels of pesticides being on crops, the could very easily happen in Japan.

Comment by Steve Schapiro

February 8, 2008 @ 2:05 am

I worry about agricultural produce from a country in which the highest attribute for agricultural products is visual uniformity.

Comment by Kouta

April 21, 2008 @ 5:28 pm

I worry about poison gyoza from China.but I more worry about self-sufficiency ratio for grain of Japan.She depends on a lot of foreign food.She can’t live for oneself.

Comment by Garrett DeOrio

April 21, 2008 @ 7:06 pm

Kouta, what’s the solution? Japan can’t produce enough food to feed everyone in Japan and even trying to make as much of Japan’s food as possible domestically would cause food prices to rise dramatically. How much are you willing to pay for lunch?

Comment by Ken Worsley

April 21, 2008 @ 8:34 pm

DeOrio, increased domestic production would bring down prices, that’s the whole problem.

1,400 tons of wheat were destroyed by the Ministry of Agriculture last year in order to keep prices up. There are some powerful forces working against self-sufficiency.

Comment by Garrett DeOrio

April 21, 2008 @ 8:48 pm

For wheat. No doubt for other crops as well, but for the whole variety of foods consumed in Japan? Is Japan going to produce all the meat Japan consumes? It’s easier to grow rice or veggies on terraces than cattle.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>